....you can watch at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiNiS-BBIT4&feature=related
As you can see,it's no more than a plain test with a long pendulum 180* free fall (and inertial storage...) vis-a-vis short pendulum long-lasting rotation.
You can add some steps :
-with a rotating counterweighted pendulum arrangement (resembling to Milkovic's lever with a pendulum).
-with a limiting "knee-joint" for pendulum,so to get an easy a self-sustenable difference torque on the same side of the fulcrum/stabile pivot(smaller than...longer than...).
-with an "adequate size",for this "self-pulsatory lever".
All the best! / Alex
That video is not showing :-\
It just shows the following message...
"The video you have requested is not available.
If you have recently uploaded this video, you may need to wait a few minutes for the video to process."
.....you can find also,at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7Yd71fzlB4&feature=related and some movies "around" it.
All the best! /Alex
...as a concise,laconic expression of a possible gravity motor,outlines nothing more,than a free full pendular fall in gravity (0-180*),with a starting velocity in the top position.
So,if you realize a "self" starting velocity you have a "path" to a gravity motor.
To get the "self-motion",we need to imagine a certain counterweighted physical pendulum,in a pulsatory repetitive sequence for the counterweght arm,so to obtain a continuous torque difference on the same side of the fulcrum.
All the best! / Alex
Hi Jerry!
I remind you from that www.inter-corporate.com ,now out of net.
It was a suitable place to change ideas,for inertial propulsion,firstly.
As I perceive inertial propulsion (future transport) and gravity motor (future energy) ,are two associated domains ,due to a common symbol :a certain kind of pendular arrangement.
"I never think of the future.It comes soon enough"/Albert Einstein.
I wish good luck for you,also.
All the best! / Alex
.....can be no more,than a starting point to imagine a practical gravity oscillator.
For inertial propulsion,we must think in the terms of inertial oscillator.
We know to use so easy electromagnetic field and ...osciillators.
It's a time problem:.150 years ago,this domain was a "shadowy" one.
So,in my opinion, energy and transport problems of the future are related to gravity and inertial oscillators:a real "rediscovery" of the old lever concept.
All the best! / Alex
Hi Jerry !
As I can see on net,you have an interesting and optimistic site ( www.space.org ).
Optimism is the disposal to look on the brightside,or as Leibniz quoted that ..."we are living in the best possible world",thinking maybe ,about the science and our ability to discover the path to our next steps of existence.
I wish success to your power of acting...
All the best ! / An inertial Sailor (especial for Jerry...)
Hi Jerry !
Regarding inertial propulsion,I recommend two practical pendular arrangements,you can see on net:
- www.evert.de (here you search information about Felix Wurth ).
- naturtechnik.de (here you can watch a short movie of Kilian Otmar Keil ).
They made the first step...but with "no target" in mind :
-Wurth developed an interesting,but non controllable pendular vector.
-Otmar made an excellent assemble,but with a "frozen" pendular effect and so,with a null usable vector.
In my opinion,the real aim is to obtain a stable and controllable vector .
In my vision (and papers...),this is called "Tractive pendulum" ).
All the best! / Alex ...for you...An inertial sailor...
Hi Jerry !
What I had in my mind was ,that old "Wurth-Swing-Systems-Success".
You can find it,if you type on net :
- www.evert.de/eft377e.htm
My point was not Evert's rotors,but simply this Wurth's pendular system,that develops an interesting and strong inertial vector.
The problem is to evolve and control the push...
All the best! / Alex
The device, I have done software simulation, the result is only hovering around the origin can not be a continuous directional movement. ;D
Hi Jerry !
This movie from Andy,living in Budapest,( www.haveland.com ),is on the same line ,with Wurth and Kilian...but with more "inspiration".
All the best! /Alex
Hi Jerry!
Enter on www.youtube.com
Search "Living energy machine"
At 12-th position you have a short movie from haveland.com
You have 3 running wheels with pendular attachments...
intended to play as an "antigravity engine".
Two question here:
-what is antigravity?!
-can it work on vertical line (against gravity "pressure") only ?!
In my opinion, he had a suggestive " sparke" of mind,transposed into a simulation and useful for some people ,interested in inertial propulsion,as a future concept in transportation.
All the best! / Alex
Hi Jerry !
You can find on youtube.com ,ahaveland's simulation of an antigravity machine,at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbGHp0Ieh1I
All the best !/Alex
Hi Jerry !
Antigravity,in my opinion,is no more than a "chimeric" denomination...an illusion about reality.If you like,it's no more than an unnecessary bravery.
Felix Wurth discovered and proved a very powerful and interesting ,side-axis vector (push,jerk):input seems to be small,the output much greater,in my opinion.If this relation is real,have we a kind of "overunity" for transportation?!
I my design,I called it "Tractive pendulum"...
Unfortunately,Wurth's arrangement has not a stable control...and he seems to be "out of game" ten years ago...
Otmar's arrangement(running eccentric wheels on a closed path) is so handycraft ("German style"),but his powerful jerks are alike that of a defective "eccentic washing machine".
The last,but not the least,Robinson's antigravity machine (what a name!?),reopens Wurth's puzzle.
The main problem for these would-be side-axis tractive vectors,is to be controllable (if we carry out as much useful power for transportation).
All the best !/Alex
Hi Jerry!
About your very short movie,I have no comments...
About side axis vector (Wurth...),if we can control this one:
-seems to have an "overunity" characteristic,feature
-it's a noisy mechanism
All the best! / Alex
Hi Jerry!
Sorry,I have not the handycraft of Otmar...
I had one,some times ago,but the accuracy,for the beggining is so important ,to proof a new effect...
For me,the concept is the main purpose.
All the best !/ Alex