Did you notice the amount of erased free-energy videos on youtube?
Supression?
CIA orders?
In the future...if anybody comes up with the 'holy grail', just put it on 'facebook'...nothing ever disappears from 'favebook'.
Regards...
Quote from: emmanux on October 26, 2010, 11:08:28 AM
Did you notice the amount of erased free-energy videos on youtube?
Supression?
CIA orders?
Failure to work as advertised? Selling plans for something that doesn't work and cannot work?
Mistaken and embarrassed inventors? Pissed-off investors with nothing to show but a bunch of copper wire and magnets?
I haven't really noticed it myself, but the same or similar subject was raised here a while back - http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9532.0
Are you talking about video's by experimenters or video's just talking about free energy? Video's come and go for various reasons, even if they're not being supressed. People sometimes just delete their old video's, proven scammers get taken down...Is there anything in particular you're referring to?
In regards to Youtube in general though, I myself found a distinct change in Youtube's 'tone' a few months back when they did their big overhaul. For a while there people's comments had no time stamp associated with them, which I found stifling of the conversations that can arise around video's, conversations which can lead to people making new connections and discoveries. I mean, why make a comment, or even read them, if you don't know whether the previous comment was made five minutes or five years ago, if you know what I mean. It also makes it easier to disregard 'challenging' subject matter if you don't know whether anyone else has bothered to comment on the video recently, if it has no 'currency' as it were. Subtle points perhaps, but true nonetheless, for me anyway. At the same time, as part of their 'updating', Youtube changed the way related video's appeared next to the video you were watching. It's just my subjective impression, but I'm sure the way they used to do it was more likely to result in seeing more interesting and 'educational' video's. Back then, before the changes, the related video's wouldn't be so specifically related to the one you were already watching, but could lead you to 'broadening your scope' on a subject. Right after they changed things around though, you'd watch one video and all the video's related to it were almost the exact same video, leaving you with nowhere to go except onto a new subject entirely. I didn't find any of the changes they made to their page layout a real improvement either. And all the reasons they gave for the changes sounded superficial at best.
Anyway, that's my rant for the day, Youtube isn't what it was. And when it comes to suppression, it's now easier for whoever's into that, to do that. Was interesting too, I thought, that those changes to Youtube happened around the same time as some of the security agencies themselves started making public comments and announcements about their intentions to...control or influence the internet's content by adding more online manpower to it. Then the whole net neutrality thing started up...
Okay, what the hell, while I'm here, and at the risk of going too far off topic. About the internet in general...
From a certain point of view, it could be said that despite the apparent freedoms the internet has brought, it has more potential to be used against the people than to be used by them, that 'they' let us have our little inch of freedom to indulge in trivialities, because they knew that once we took it they'd be able to get their mile of extra control over people. Just consider the lack of privacy that goes with every aspect of a persons internet use. There is always someone, somewhere, with the ability to know exactly where you went, what you read, wrote, watched, listened to, bought, or downloaded while online. Some users may be able to disguise or hide their online presence somewhat, but most people by far wouldn't know how to or even think to do so. And those who do, automatically become objects of suspicion should their 'secrecy' be revealed. Doesn't matter if you're innocent or guilty of any given thing, that's not the point. The point is, there is no privacy on the internet. And yet the internet is becoming more and more integral and essential to the way society runs. So, yeah, how exactly is that supposed to help us all get where we're supposed to be going? Who exactly is worthy of having such oversight and control over others? The more dependent we become on the net the more dependent we become on the mercy of those with the power to influence it and, literally, switch it off or shut down access to parts of it as they see fit. So what freedoms have we gained exactly by doing that? And what might we have lost and be risking? It's my current opinion that the true potential of the internet hasn't yet been realized, and that it might not be until it can be used by the powers that be as a means of shocking a global populace into exhibiting a pre-determined response. The way people connect via the internet and mobile phones nowadays is a fruit rapidly ripening and being readied for the picking. What happens when there's a system in place that can allow staged events to create controlled hysteria and reactionary thinking to spread like wildfire on and unprecedented scale? What happens when what is seen by many to be an alternative to the mainstream media becomes the latest and greatest and most effective tool ever for social engineering and manipulation? I can't see the people that are into that sort of manipulation being able to resist at least trying to use the modern media in the same way they've used every other form throughout history.
That is a good reason: They do scam, and try to erase evidence?
Recently the guy of WITTs tried scam me.
Quote from: lwh on October 26, 2010, 08:26:04 PM
Anyway, that's my rant for the day, Youtube isn't what it was. And when it comes to suppression, it's now easier for whoever's into that, to do that. Was interesting too, I thought, that those changes to Youtube happened around the same time as some of the security agencies themselves started making public comments and announcements about their intentions to...control or influence the internet's content by adding more online manpower to it. Then the whole net neutrality thing started up...
New World Order coming on...
CONFIRMED.
Note the english message on a spanish page. Half-baked work?
CLEARLY censorship.
Quote from: emmanux on October 26, 2010, 11:08:28 AM
Did you notice the amount of erased free-energy videos on youtube?
Supression?
CIA orders?
Just suppression by their authors of scams, hoax and other not working devices, after finding their errors or after having fun with comments reading.
For the more vicious, the reason to say: "my machine works, that is why it was suppressed, I'm a great inventor and a victim of conspiracy!" ;D
Quote from: exnihiloest on November 10, 2010, 03:28:31 AM
Just suppression by their authors of scams, hoax and other not working devices, after finding their errors or after having fun with comments reading.
For the more vicious, the reason to say: "my machine works, that is why it was suppressed, I'm a great inventor and a victim of conspiracy!" ;D
Exnihiloest, you're outdated, take a look at the username. Mr. Hutchison, right now is changing the History by cleaning the water in the Gulf of Mexico (oil disaster that was an inside job of the NWO government in USA). He is doing this beatiful work with free energy (no overunity, but yes with free energy).
He is totally IGNORED by the mass media, and now SUPRESSED, as you can see.
Good sleep (or awakening, you choose...)
Quote from: emmanux on November 10, 2010, 07:44:53 AM
...Mr. Hutchison, right now is changing the History by cleaning the water in the Gulf of Mexico
...
He is totally IGNORED by the mass media, and now SUPRESSED, as you can see.
...
Journalists from mass media do their job: to not spread unverified or false information.
There are exceptions, nevertheless they have not to prove their innocence, the burden of proof that they are guilty is yours as well as the proof that those who suppress videos are not linked to the authors themselves.
Whenever i find one missing i contact the youtuber who uploaded it. I either get no reply or am told by them that they took it down.
Quote from: DeepCut on November 12, 2010, 07:50:32 PM
Whenever i find one missing i contact the youtuber who uploaded it. I either get no reply or am told by them that they took it down.
Ok, you are right, may be I'm a little conspiranoic.
Maybe you'll live longer that way ;+}
Well I think there may be one of several reasons such videos may have been removed. One being the inventor, who in excitement but yet in lack of understanding,,later finds out what he thought to be correct was not, so out of embarrassment, or hoping not to look further silly, the owner removes a video, hey even I have done it for that reason. On a more serious side note, the reason an owner or someone else may have removed the video,,is because the idea actually worked,,and someone said hey Ill pay you such in such for the idea/machine and in return all you got to do is remove all videos of it,,and keep quiet about it, hey it happens. And lastly worst case scenario is someone high up you might say found such to be to much of a step on the toes,,and got really upset and made things happen, for the worse of the inventor or the video...Money talks..On the bright side of things, I think that last worst case scenario rarely ever happens now days, there's just to many discoveries happening worldwide/everywhere --all the time --for such to even be worth while, even as an attempt or hope as to hush up them all.
I think the autors suppress theirs video scam, when the invention is tested by OU forums and they don't achieve OU... The autors close theirs account and go away...
Actually OU has been achieved so long ago, sadly its all more a scam now days to make money off of such,,all the while pretending it has not been discovered yet, its kind of like a charity taking money to find a cure, but they never do, cause if they did, the donations end, and it all goes over to another corporation, perhaps big pharma,,who then sells it,,and then they make all the money,,some business even tho it works,for some,,does not benefit humanity as a whole! Ill give you a simple example of OU, take one capacitor, charge it on a battery for one second, all the while do the test that shows how much of the battery drained while doing this,,how much charge went into the capacitor while doing this,,and how much came out of the capacitor and for how long as it was drained. Now you have your basic math to play with. Then repeat the experiment, but wire 10 capacitors in parallel, charge them for a second, and then after they are charged connect them all in series,,and drain them, what was the results, compare the math, you get more output that way then input, in relation to amperage and current out,,then what was used to charge them in parallel. Strange how business is,, its always about the benefits of the few and rarely about the benefits of the many. But such is life I guess,,just saying..
1) I'am doubtfull with your exemple with your capacitor: you cannot create energy by connecting them in serie/parallel.. this is conventional circuitery...
2) In this world, we lives in a comercial world: so if an inventor can make money with OU, we cannot blame it for this...
3) OU is for the "humanity": cheap unlimited energy can reduce the cost of the life and production, and help the depressing global economy, but I'am doubtfull that everything can be "FREE" even with OU production, an electrical company that use FE devices can have maintenance fees for exemple.
4) Tomorrow I build a true FE device, BP, Total and Exxon propose me 10 billions dollars in a Tax haven, to close my mouth about this, you reject an offer like this without reflexion seriously, even for "the sake of humanity" stuff ?
5) "Actually OU has been achieved so long ago" --> I'am not sure about this...
This is very difficult to obtain reliable information, and correct measurement, rarely even anything about self looping, only some legend like this: "the inventor "A" have invented a device "B" that convert ZPE field into electricity, he have powered his home many years, but unfortunalety was killed by CIA or the patent was bought by multinational "C" and energy company "D"..."
6) Is this a good solution to distribute massively FE devices into the population, if you have FE devices you can make large scale weapons, so FE is a concept to avoid war for energy (oil, gaz, uranium, etc), so is this the best solution ? I think human population is doesn't mature to deal officialy with FE devices... even with conventional technology we can destroy entirely the planet (nuclear weapon)...
@ Schurbert
You really just dont know do you,,and as to your comment in number 4, BP proposed you ten billion dollars, come on get real. Do you think anyone with half a brain,,is going to believe that?? First of all BP did not offer you 10 billion dollars, simply because they would not offer that much,,and second of all if they did, you would have taken the money lol. And as to my previous statement about the capacitor, well you do the math, if you just dont want to believe that,,its ok, believe what you want, but no one is going to believe BP offered you 10 billion dollars,,and you refused,,HA...
LOL, read once again my post, I NEVER SAID BP OFFER ME 10 BILLIONS, (I think if you have a WORKING large scale OU device 10 billions dollars by several company and governement is not too much !!!) they have more to lose than your 10 billions if you reveal your WORKING DEVICE not a scam or a 10 milliwatts flashing led toy. For your sake BP doesn't have offered me 10 billions, because I have not invented a large scale FE device, unfortunately.
For the series/parallels capacitors just read law and equation about this circuitries. The net output is always the same of the input minus loss...
Exept if your special capacitor draw energy from environement, ZPE, time, space, whatever you want...
AH indeed, you are correct, your English is a bit off,,but in number 4 you forgot to say "if" and without an "if" it sounded like you stated it as a statement,,not an "if statement" lol but yes I understand now. But I would never ask so much,,that much is the kind of money that would get one killed, in fact I have offered a few ideas for free,,if you look up my name in the post. And Ill leave this one as it is,,best wishes,,stephen...
Yes, my English is a bit off, because, English is not my original language, I'am French and live in France... I must use some google translation to help me, so you know this, Google translation is not perfect...
its understandable,,even in America we do not speak good English lol...