Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?

[Doctor No]

Can you elaborate on this statement?

Yes of course, i see time came to explain this. To understand all, You have first to think, from where the forces comes (are born). I mean specially this force, which pushes us against window in car during accident. I have written about already today, in other topic: this power (antigravity) which pushes us not only in such situation, but also through time and space, comes really from our bodies intern (with overlight speed going-overunity) life. We wanted to prove this in experiment last summer, but after this silly accident with our President Kachynsky (auch eine  gut maskierte Jude) we had no possibility to make it in such situation.  One of first who will not only hear (as HVL and Koala from Austral Land) but also see it, will be Herr Randy.                                           In Name von unsere heilige Fuhrer Karl "Der Onkel" Woytyla                                              Dr Adolf Nowak                             

[CrazyFox]

Nozzle jet flow of hydrogel and dielectrophoretic migration of charge to aqueous NaBH4 micelles to create magnetron resonance in cavitation double shell plasma cluster (IEC) to fusion B11-p+H. This drove the Clem Engine steam/oil fractions expansion that drove the otherwise hydraulic motor. Aneutronic fusion produces 3He and x-rays. Where does the charge come from? Helical drag pump inductive charging of the hydrogel in vortex flow in open to case channels. The pump was surplus Schauberger pump from his visit to the US. Surplus in that the two pump available were ME-109 cooling pumps originally.

[ramset]

CrazyFox
Well I agree with most of that except for this part!
Quote:
Helical drag pump inductive charging of the hydrogel in vortex flow in open to case channels.
--------------------------------
No way!!
Chet

[ramset]

CrazyFox
Thank you for the Email!
I appreciate that.
Chet

[mscoffman]

@CrazyFox;

I am thinking that the Clem engine is another CF cold fusion variation
like the Italian Rossi Reactor. I have felt this way since I read the
article below on the Koldamasov CF cavitation device.

I postulated that the CF cold fusion side reaction that processes the
C carbon atoms in the target does so in a radiogenic fashion unlike D
deuterium reaction, ie. it generates actual ionizing radiation.

The thing is it is probably possible the CF reaction involving adding a CF
nucleon to Carbon and the B+p boron aneutronic fusion both result in
excited Carbon nuclei. I know Eric J. Learner of Lawrenceville Plasma
Physics Inc. said that the boron + proton fusion does result in such a
short lived Carbon nucleus.  In  other words if the gamma radiation
came from an unstable Carbon nucleus then both methods may produce
the same gamma radiation spectrum.

Also that sonofusion experiment using carbon bearing benzene also
claimed to have seen ionizing radiation.

So I think Cold Fusion is a simpler and the much more likely explanation
rather than the very high initiation energy of a B+p aneutronic fusion
reaction as a basis of the Clem engine.

---

See sections #’s 18. and 19. below on Russian scientist; A.I. Koldamasov;

http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2008/NET27.shtml

Further speculation of connectivity between the Clem Engine and A.I. Koldamasov;

http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/37446/A-Clem-Engine-derived-Fusion-Turbine

:S:MarkSCoffman