1 coil 1 cap 1 magnet 1KW theory schematic device cheap tiny published openly

[kampen]

[reviewer #2355unconfirmed user] added 14th May, 2011 at 10:00:19

The author obviously does not know much about theoretical physics.
As an example he does not know that classical physics is not self-consistent.
Peculiarly, the Gauss equation is not consistent with other classical concepts.
The author has just found another example of inconsistence, his analysis is a shame for the community.
The author should learn quantum mechanics.
A good starting point would be Feynman Lectures On Physics (the volumes on quantum mechanics), where the author shows another example of self-inconsistence of classical physics, peculiarly of magnetism equations.
As a conclusion, the author’s analysis is wrong.
He should withdraw its article from the site, so as not to spread FUD among non physicist.

[reviewer #2355unconfirmed user] added 14th May, 2011 at 10:00:19

[nul-points]

hi guys

to balance up that report from a negative reviewer of the Turtur design...

it looks to me like the coil/ magnet arrangement is VERY similar to the concept which the physicist Leon Dragone reported in a paper of his

Dragone unfortunately died, so we can't find out more than is in his paper, but he does specifically say that he observed overunity behaviour in a diametric magnet rotating within an enclosing solenoid coil

i think this is even without a cap to resonate the coil

having seen Romero's device stick two fingers up to 'conventional science' i'd be quite interested to give the Turtur/Dragone idea a go, too

first things first - the Muller replication!

cheers
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com

[triffid]

test