Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Stephen Horvath Hydrogen Patent + 1974 Ford Fairlane

Started by Torana, November 05, 2010, 02:16:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Torana

Ive tracked info on Horvath so folks can get a better picture of the guy.

Everything Stan Meyer was talking about , Horvath already done ,and in a cool car too.
The guys a Legend and an Aussie , howzat .
Stan Meyers studied the Horvath Patents .
Stephen Horvath SHOULD be more well known than Stan so hopefully this will get a bit of interest and get his name out .

The Ford Fairlane......
http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/features/horvaths-hydrogen-fairlane/story-e6freoro-1111119160884

The man......
http://www.stephenhorvath.com.au

The present site......
http://www.starscientific.com.au

The Patent US3954592......
http://energyshowandtell.wetpaint.com/page/US3954592%2FHorvath%2F1976




mscoffman


@all

This is Muon Catalysed Fusion as opposed to cold fusion. It
is already a technically accepted form of a nuclear reaction.


Notes:

A) I thought it was worked with standard hydrogen atoms rather
then just with the less available deuterium atoms.

B) I also thought it was "anuetronic" meaning it produced no
free neutrons. Free neutrons make it like a standard fission
reaction requiring sheilding.

C) maybe A and B are related - maybe, this is how they develop
the requisite pions.

:S:MarkSCoffman

Torana

I dont believe that car was dealing with quarks,quantum Hall effect or meson zero spin..
The patent I have has a magnetron which is another red herring.
Where the company is today is with their technology is 30 years from where they once were.
How they describe the cars technology and operation is entirely up to them, its their possession, they could call it they way they sees it.

The good thing about this patent is that it has a circuit diagram and a parts list.
Anyone who can follow a diagram should be able to see that the circuit is NON FUNCTIONAL.
from left to right = a UJT oscillator/saw tooth , SCR , fullwave centre tap transformer and on the right a push pull resonant primary.

Are the diodes right way around?
Are the 3055 bases connected to the trigger coils?
Is the trans pos or neg centre tap?

I wouldnt be surprised if some one is ordering the parts right now,the same thing happened with Meyers diagram, everyone believed they could replicate, and still do...by reading the patent.

I think its the greatest patent available simply because it has a highly detailed Non functional circuit which SHOULD hilite the FACT that a Patent is not instructional on any level.
Its a legal document  written by a patent lawyer and diagrams by a draughtsman ,to a standard= all patents look the same.

The company talking about Deuterium takes it all in another direction .

canufi

Quote from: Torana on November 05, 2010, 07:56:25 PM
I wouldnt be surprised if some one is ordering the parts right now,the same thing happened with Meyers diagram, everyone believed they could replicate, and still do...by reading the patent.

People have replicated Meyer's circuits because not only do we have diagrams of the circuits, we have photographs of Stan's actual circuit boards taken from his Estate, which Tony Woodside has videos of on youtube.

Why don't you compare Stan's ACTUAL circuits (the photographs) to his patents.... how different are they? What has been modified by Stan?

Why don't you point out any differences in Stan's actual circuits, versus his patents. 

Stop complaining and whining all over this site, do something productive with your time. Yes, Stan was a kookoo, so what are you going to do about it? Whine and complain? Why don't you take a look at Stan's actual circuits and the photographs of them, and compare them to the patents - and point out any differences. That would be constructive instead of whining all over this website.

Torana

 All over this site??        this thread is dated  nov 5 2010!!

"we have diagrams ..of   ???.........of what youve been given!.

stan meyers did not write his patents, the patent lawyer did and the circuits are drawn by the in house draftsman.  Standard practice in ALL patent attourney offices around the world

Where have I complained all over this site?

no where  have I discouraged anyone , give me an example as if I need one.

Youll recieve photos and info your meant to and thats about it , good luck .stick a match to the mighty 8XA cell to see how much gas your getting, .

There was a guy in Australia who had a Hydrogen 4 stroke Generator 15 years ago, easy enough to build , I did and it runs . What is it = series Electrolysis cell .

Try that with an 8XA = does not work !!!!

You should be questioning where your info comes from ,other wise your just sitting back and receiving just another form of readers digest and swearing by it.

is that productive?