Kromrey Convertor

[oouthere]

This is frustrating....

Looking through Bedini's work, it specifically states that the Kromrey patent is incorrect and he found the corrections.  The beauty of it is, he's proven this design and it's not based upon a high effeciency battery charging system like the Bedini free energy generator, but on a simple input/output power.  I don't know if true input power vs output power was used (i.e. .7 x sine wave under load), but it's still o/u even if not.

These are the results:

input/load/output:

a.  99.06watts/none/none 

b.  98.67 watts/lamp & batt charging/21 watts

c.  67.8 watts/13.5 ohm resistor/185.19 watts

d.  50.37 watts/.63 ohm resistor/634.92 watts

Now for the $64k question, what modifications were required to the patent?

Rich

[BorisKrabow]

Hi ALL !   Design changes . 

[BorisKrabow]

Additions ....

[BorisKrabow]

motor alternator US 4567407  1982 John W. Ecklin

[ramset]

Boris
Thank you

Can you assist with more info or help with a replication [for open source] ?
ChetKremens@gmail.com