Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Solar Panels

Started by jingwei3344, August 26, 2015, 02:00:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Magluvin

Quote from: Pirate88179 on August 28, 2015, 11:35:35 PM
That is total BS right there and why we should never allow the government, either state or federal, to have this much power over us.  Solar City, I believe, is one of Elon Musk's companies and they have done some great things in advancing solar energy.

Some folks can't even plant a garden in their yard without the EPA jumping all over them.  This crap has to stop.

So, this system made too much power?  Too bad and good for them.  Considering the lack of efficiency of solar and the high upfront costs involved this is a total BS argument.  What are cells now like 16-18% efficient?  Why even work on creating cells that are like 40% efficient if the government will not allow any one to use them?

Sorry, this type of thing really gets to me.  (Can you tell?)

Bill

Hey Bill

I hear ya. So just imagine the lengths they would go to to stop a free energy device, other than solar. Solar is just too mainstream to get rid of it completely.

And I agree about if it produces a bit of extra power. So what. Its not 10 times what the might need. The extra percent over 100% gives headroom like an audio amplifier. Probably rarely if ever turn the volume all the way up, but the extra power is there if needed. To design  solar system that only provides a possible 100% of the total household needs is possibly pushing the system to its limits, which is not good either. Id like to see the criteria used to base those 100% assumptions. It just nuts

Mags