Global Warming, unstoppable

[lancaIV]

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globale_Erw%25C3%25A4rmung
2016 was the warmest year since systematic measurements began in 1880.
                         It was around 1.1 ° C warmer than in pre-industrial times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No,AG,it is NOT possible to short this "dwd"- statement to 2 sentences !The facts of uncertainity have to be clarified with this greater texte !
And more real and correct study/ies,as explained !

When we have in our calculations in sum  up to 4°K misreadings related Kyoto Conference 80% GHG-reduction and Paris Conference 1,5-2°K temperature increase hold we have to reduce this analytical/measuring error !

The error is not energy art&kind consume related !
And these error statements are known since the 80' from the last century,the parlamentarians and eco-lobbyistsare manipulating the citizens for decades and demand eco-taxes and CO2-emission certification tax !

The green parties in parliaments,the FFF,Greenpeace,Robin Wood,the IPCC :
their actions soft suggestive-manipulative facts based ! Credibility !

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://scilogs.spektrum.de/klimalounge/verwirrspiel-um-die-absolute-globale-mitteltemperatur/

For example, 1961-1990 was 0.10 ° C warmer than 1951-1980.

from the dwd-pdf :
There are problems at all stations insofar as almost everywhere in Europe and also worldwide at the end of the 1980s / beginning of the 1990s the temperature is now recorded using electronic methods instead of a mercury thermometer. When switching from the mercury thermometer to "modern" measuring methods, changes in temperature are recorded much faster than before. Above all, the maximum "benefits" at which peaks are now recorded every minute, sometimes every second. This results in maxima that are often 2 K higher than with the more sluggish mercury thermometer.


                                                                        REPEAT :
         This results in maxima that are often 2 K higher than with the more sluggish mercury thermometer.                     
          small part,maxima/medium  ?  related "  It was around 1.1 ° C warmer than in pre-industrial times. "
         
It is possible that a small part of the global temperature increase that has taken place since 1990 is actually simulated by a change in the measurement methods - which still needs to be investigated!

      end 80/beginning 90 temperature measure technology station-by-station change and climate temperature :

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f8/Global_Temperature_Anomaly.svg/langde-310px-Global_Temperature_Anomaly.svg.png


                                                               1990 - 2020 : 0,7 °K increase
                                                                land-ocean temperature
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.focus.de/wissen/klima/energie-von-1-3-milliarden-kochenden-wasserkesseln-waermer-als-je-zuvor-meerwasser-erreicht-2020-neues-rekordhoch_id_12868896.html
Two independent data series that go back to 1955 served as the basis.

question : meteorological data measurement between 1955 and 1990,1990-2020  ?

We know that the global mean temperature in the period 1961-1990 was 14.0 ± 0.5 ° C (Jones et al 1999 ).                             
    assuming all data measured by :  mercury thermometer     



the given spread arithmetical global mean temperature  freedome 2020, 14.0 ± 0.5 ° C  + 0.7° C  : 

  14-0,5 = 13,5 + 0,7 = 14,2  14 + 0,5 + 0,7 = 15,2

  less technical measurement errors
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       So it is only known within an uncertainty range of around 1 ° C.

                           It was around 1.1 ° C warmer than in pre-industrial times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the Paris Agreement, global warming should be limited to well below 2 degrees compared to the pre-industrial temperature level - if possible even to 1.5 ° C (see my article on the German emissions budget ).


Error potential neutralized climate change modelling +sun cycle + planetary magnetospheric change !
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.scinexx.de/news/kosmos/ein-neuer-sonnenzyklus-hat-begonnen/
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.weltderphysik.de/gebiet/erde/erde/sonnenwind/
The earth, on the other hand, has very good protection against particles from space: it has a strong magnetic field and an atmosphere. The charged particles from the solar wind and cosmic rays are deflected by the magnetic field in such a way that they circle around the earth in a kind of storage ring, known as the Van Allen Belt. In doing so, they deform the earth's magnetic field - the stronger the solar wind, the stronger. These changes in the magnetic field can even be measured on the earth's surface.

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.mdr.de/wissen/umwelt/umpolung-des-erdmagnetfeldes-dauert-jahrtausende-100.html

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://weather.com/de-DE/wissen/astronomie/news/2020-05-27-magnetfeld-der-erde-schwacht-sich-ab
Anomaly spreads and migrates The development should always be kept in mind. According to ESA, the Earth's magnetic field has lost an average of around 9 percent of its strength over the past two centuries, with the decline in the area of ​​the South Atlantic anomaly being particularly strong: There, the minimum field strength has fallen from around 24,000 nanoteslas to 22,000 nanoteslas - Tesla since 1970 is the unit for the flux density of alternating magnetic fields.




But here the earth magnetic field as shield is important for climatic influence !

step-by-step changes !
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/solar-events-news/Does-the-Solar-Cycle-Affect-Earths-Climate.html
While the magnitude of those changes would likely be small – around a couple of tenths of degrees in the global mean, because solar irradiance changes slowly on decadal time scales – there is some evidence for solar-cycle related regional enhancements of the effects in the North Atlantic and surrounding regions.

In addition, phases of low solar activity can even influence the earth's climate: several times in history, times with a particularly calm sun led to a cooling of the climate with noticeably cold winters, as historical data suggests. However: The warming caused by anthropogenic climate change will not be able to stop even a low level of solar activity.



https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226454722_Lunar_Influences_On_Climate
https://www.sciencealert.com/the-moon-really-does-impact-rainfall-on-earth-study-finds

1999 : https://www.nature.com/news/1999/990624/full/news990624-9.html
all possible sources of variation should be investigated before blaming human activity alone for observed changes in climatic parameters.



for a catalytic process often for iniciation very low forces are in need ! Lawine-/Domino-effect !


Global Warming and/or Global Cooling
The same planetary average temperature but continental / regional / local climate change !
And amplitude crescendo : super hot and super cold but only for short peaks  !

Vivaldi : 4 seasons :  in 1 month, 1 week ?

2004 Cristmas earthquake and Tsunami in the Pacific : more 4° sun-earth inclination change !
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.br-online.de/wissen-bildung/spacenight/sterngucker/erde/ekliptik.html

but https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-details-earthquake-effects-on-the-earth/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11589-013-0023-2

They then tested the correlation between seismic activity and the effect of solar wind and cosmic rays on the ionosphere and found that the temporal distributions of the particle burst showed some correspondence with the occurrence and duration of earthquakes.
......

Their data analysis of global earthquakes larger than magnitude 7.8 as well as Wenchuan and Chilean aftershocks suggest that these occurred primarily during the 23rd and 24th solar cycle. Not only did their study validate the temporal relationship between earthquake occurrences and solar and lunar orbits, but it also applied the concept of the degree of aggregation. The study suggests that the location of the shocks tended to occur in the direction of the magnetic field generated by solar wind.

What and how does this affect during the earth the sun circumcycling elliptic ( not crise-round 360°)  rotation !?
Now : more oceanic or landmass radiation absorvation ? 24/365

The ant-/artic poles and their ice to water masses ?El ninjo/ la ninja influence !
The magnetic poles movements !

Saltwater/water volumetric change ! Density ! Greater absorvation surface !

Climate change parametrics : humans independent      but influencing


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://uebermedien.de/41860/die-homogenisierung-der-klima-berichterstattung-ist-ein-problem/

Sincere
OCWL

p.s.: actually phenomen,but known : https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/polarwirbel-kollaps-spanien-schnee-madrid-1.5172298     

[AlienGrey]

Yes that's better i can read it now ! 

[magpwr]

Hi everyone,
It seems most of you are merely aware of global warming.

I need to inform you guys that we have even bigger problems in the near future.

The Earth currently have around 21% oxygen (O2) in air and we humans needs around 19% oxygen to breathe normally.

Sad to say that the ocean does produce most oxygen for the planet and this is depleting.
https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-briefs/ocean-deoxygenation

---------------------------------
Long story short -As the human population increase so will the cattle,chicken and etc will emit higher Co2 into the air and this cause acidification in the ocean which also kills tiny plants in the ocean which generate breathable oxygen for us.


https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/What+is+Ocean+Acidification%3F