Energy recycling part 2.

[spacecowboy]

Part 2 of my video on energy recycling. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxEvmRbI7YE

[dieter]

Interesting. I guess, if the parallel batteries pose a resistance to the cirquit, then the serial batteries would be drained earlier without them, just driving the motor.


Additionally, a reed switch has a back emf spike that may to some degree charge the serial batteries as well, even tho only for vey short impulses.

[sm0ky2]

What happens when you place a load on the motor shaft?

[spacecowboy]

Good question,I did run an experiment kind of like this once with a radio, and the batteries did charge, of course as it is you dont reach a full recharge obviously, as there are many variables that still need to be worked out, many experiments left to try for sure. I just found it amazing that you can recycle any energy at all in the first place. As all this is still in its infancy as they say and has not even approached anything close to perfection. Its all just proof of concept, that it is possible. Like the first log someone seen floating and then thought if a boat could be made out of it, very primitive as it is, but holds great potential I think.

[Magnethos]

You are combining there 2 techniques. The first one is "splitting the positive" and the second one is "Wiseman's Energy recycling technique".


As you know, electricity is a side effect of "electron flow". Load doesn't consume any power. The source of energy neutralizes itself, so in Tom Bearden words... you are killing the dipole.


A battery is a transformer from vacuum energy. As much as you can keep the dipole created, you will have energy. Dipole neutralization means no energy flowing from space to circuit. As long as you have a dipole, you have energy flowing from space. So energy doesn't come from battery. Battery transforms energy in an usable form.


So you need to check how to keep the dipole open. In AC is easier than in DC.