Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



HeLP with COP of motor

Started by metalspider, December 10, 2008, 04:17:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gyulasun

Quote from: terry1094 on December 17, 2008, 08:56:22 PM
Ein= (254x2x0.0004)+(262x9x0.0012) = 3.03 Joules (per cycle)

Eout= 0.31*2*pi=1.95 Joules (per cycle)

COP = Eout/Ein = 1.95/3.03 = 0.64

I agree with your input energy calculations.

You may wish to rethink your output energy calculations.

Once the RPM is given, you have to consider it.

See this link, out of many : http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/electrical-motors-torques-d_651.html

rgds,
Gyula

terry1094

Okay, I'll rethink it.  Done.  Nope, it doesn't matter how fast the motor is spinning as long as your energy calculations are done per unit.  In this case the per unit calc is one revolution.

Think of it this way, work is force times distance.  With the newton-meter, you are applying one newton of force to a wheel with a radius of one meter.  The distance over which the force acts in a single cycle is the circumference of the wheel, pi x dia, or 2 x pi x the radius.

Hence, the mechanical energy expended in rotating the wheel one complete revolution is Newton x 2 x pi x radius.  It makes no difference in the ENERGY calculation whether the wheel turns its cycle in one second or one year.  The same amount of energy is expended.

The RPM does come into play when using POWER to calculate COP (a far more difficult calculation).  Then you would take the Joules (which is a Watt-second) times the revolutions per second to get average power.  But the Ein calculation becomes a bear since you have to average the pulses over the time for a cycle to get input power.

Nope, stick with the energy calculation.  Far simplier.

Terry

Honk

I understand want you mean.

But if the input pulses becomes shorter at higher RPM and average power stays the same while the output
increases as the RPM increases at the same accessible torque it should theoretically increase COP.
But then again, the average input pulse power will most likely increase as the RPM increases due to the
affect of the electromagnet inductance. It takes more power to run the EM faster. Right or wrong?
Magnet Power equals Clean Power

terry1094

Try a couple of COP calculations using power.  You'll find that RPM is in both the numerator and denominator and thusly cancels.

As far as what happens to available torque in reality as you increase RPM, it must surely decrease as you reach the mechanical limits of the bearings and windage.

I have never built one; so, I do not know.  But, yes, it should take more input power to run faster.

Terry