Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


overbalancing lenz law

Started by mr_bojangles, December 06, 2009, 06:09:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mr_bojangles

similar function as my last thread, but this time it explores an overbalanced relationship

                                         http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8262.0
keeping in mind, another way to fight lorentz (found here^)  has a main flaw being high rpm's wreaking havoc with output

i figure the only way to get over this is to keep it as low rpm as possible, for right now i would be happy with a self runner, and i believe this has the potential to do so

now lets say this version starts as shown

i am sure all of you are familiar with the motion it should exhibit, if we apply a small force, not even an inch in direction

this would be sufficient enough to have the mechanism swing all the way down, around, and back to the top where it can be stopped and repeated

the bottom line is if we are going for a self runner, time is irrelevent, meaning our mechanism can take as long as it needs to, because the slower we move something the less energy it will take us

now we know if no power were applied to this, the heavier side would bring it around and almost back to starting position, but not enough, so if we add power at the point it will be traveling the fastest (the moment it starts going back up the other side) we can figure out the exact amount of force needed to keep it going,

because this deals with a variation in weight, the amount of force necessary will be constant no matter what ratio we use, as long as its the same ratio

this means weight is irrelevant as well, as its the difference in weight and not combined weight that gives the pendulum effect

keeping all this in mind, we could rotate two large magnets with a force that is only the difference in their weight for an extremely small distance

there is no lenz drag or counter torque and it will be the same amount of energy every time, which can be increased exponentially by exploiting the weight ratio relationship

edit""
the low rpm is to ensure the counterweights will keep the disc upright relative to the magnet, and this should not get anywhere near to fast for this to occur, and at the same time adding weight to the counterweight could be used to find the right ratio instead of using different sizes of disc and magnet combo's
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it." 
-WC Fields