Bessler Wheel Theory by Alex

[Bumblebee]

One of the reasons I am here is to stop people being mis-led by fraudulent or inaccurate claims.

You've already made one by saying "The good thing is it is Perpetual Motion. It does not break any of the so-called laws of physics".

Perpetual motion does break the laws of physics, so your device cannot work as claimed.

And yes , I'm prepared to bet any amount you'd care to lose to back up the assertion.

Ok I will take back the Perpetual Motion and say... It will run until the parts wear out or I remove the control arm. It still doesn't break any of the so-called laws of physics.

I have enough money thanks.

[Airstriker]

I am more than happy to give you more clues..... Thank you for the encouragement , here's two the fulcrum of the levers is on the outside edge of the wheel and it is set at 90 degrees to the main axle.

I have decided to share my discovery.  I am hopeless with computers I would have to describe things and others would have to do the diagrams  I discovered this many years ago and got paranoid anyway...Do I need to start a new subject thread.....HELP!!!

Yes please start a new thread and put Bumblebee in it Put a link to it also in this thread. As for diagrams - you can use paint at the beggining - others will redraw it if needed. Thanks in advance.

[Ghost]

I am more than happy to give you more clues..... Thank you for the encouragement , here's two the fulcrum of the levers is on the outside edge of the wheel and it is set at 90 degrees to the main axle.

I have decided to share my discovery.  I am hopeless with computers I would have to describe things and others would have to do the diagrams  I discovered this many years ago and got paranoid anyway...Do I need to start a new subject thread.....HELP!!!

your claim and style is old news. countless others have made the same claim giving us useless clues. i doubt you'll be any different.
i'd say open source your discovery or don't share it at all. these little clue games does not help and im
sure most of us who have been in search for many years are sick of it.
im not saying you're lying but you have to understand this happens all the time.
prove me wrong and open source it.

[Zeitmaschine]

But I will tell you this :  Centrifugal force is your friend and do not worry to much about friction.

Yes, indeed!

A few hints from the eyewitness accounts:

The wheel
a) can rotate in both direction, so the interior has to be constructed symmetrically.
b) needs a push to go, so it needs a bit centrifugal force in order to start rotating.
c) accelerates to no more than 26 rpm, so the centrifugal force is also the clipper.
d) uses weights of cylindrical shape.

And in addition
e) Bessler worked as organ builder and watchmaker so he must have had a lot of experience with round things and also with rotating round things.

Now here are some equations by Jovan Marjanovic and the conclusion thereof:

»Because energy invested to move the satellite from orbit 1 to orbit 2 was equal to ΔEp and according to formula (16) it is equal to Ek1, for the same amount should total energy of orbit 2 be greater than total energy of orbit 1. However, according to formula (22) that amount is smaller, which means that there is energy loss of orbit 2 equal to ¾ Ek1. It also means that the law of conversation of energy is not valid for satellites if they change orbits.«

So what could it mean regarding the known facts about the Bessler Wheel when the law of conservation of energy is not valid as soon as centrifugal and centripetal (gravitational) forces are involved?

Don't know yet but one thing is for sure, while turning a wheel perpendicular to the ground, on the bottom the centrifugal force and the gravitational force sums up, whereas at the top of the wheel the centrifugal force counteracts the gravitational force, so something attached to the wheel (or within the wheel) would be weightless at a certain speed while passing the top (like these boats dislodged from suspension and therefore have for a brief period no physical contact with the wheel).

Any further ideas?


Supplement: Let's say the wheel turns clockwise. The weights (at least two opposite to each other) are heavier passing the bottom than passing the top. Then the task would be to achieve that due to this difference a weight going up on the left side is rather pushed towards the center whereas a weight going down on the right side is rather pushed towards the rim. This way the wheel would be dynamically over balanced at the right side due to the centrifugal force acting on its weights but not when the wheel is at rest. Maybe that will never work, but at least the concept is simple.

Let me know if it works nevertheless.