Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



pat. 3469130 Jines, J.E. Magnetic Motor, does it work?

Started by tbird, September 03, 2010, 08:19:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tbird

wings,

as i have said before, "i think any test you can do would be a grand idea!!".

i do understand about "native language is not english".  i am currently in a place where english is not the first language.  i struggle all the time.  if the desire is there, we will get by.

tom

It's better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and prove it!

energy-librarian

If I understood well, no replications or working models until now. Bad news compared to Muammar Yildiz magnet motor, which is available on a YouTube video.
BTW, did anybody make a model of the Carousel generator? Seems in the same state as this motor.
Regards.

ALEJANDRO

tbird

hi guys,

there are 2 points of interest in the picture below that might be worth considering.

1. according to the patent, this machine can run in either direction.  with the changes i've drawn (not my strong suit), this would not be possible.

2.  some one (i can't find the comment now) was concerned about the dwell angle for the cam.  this change would address that and maybe add a little extra pull to the rotor.

first note the added bell crank.  this reverses the action of the shield.  instead of the shield moving inward when the cam notch passes under the shield rod assy., the shield will move outward (lobe used now).  now the dwell angle on the cam doesn't have to be so short.  it will be more gradual, but the magnet will be fully uncovered by the time the rotor reaches it.  the stator magnet will be uncovered (at least partially) longer, but will cover quickly when the time comes.  this extra time will add extra attraction to the rotor (if it is not too far away).

this still has the benefit of being almost balanced (small effort to move) between the spring tension and the attraction of the shield to the stator magnet.  i can explain if you don't understand.

any thoughts?

tom
It's better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and prove it!

TinselKoala

Yes, I have a thought.

If you eliminate the part number 54, the "Stator Magnet", the device will "run" longer, given any initial starting spin.

tbird


TinselKoala,

QuoteYes, I have a thought.

If you eliminate the part number 54, the "Stator Magnet", the device will "run" longer, given any initial starting spin.

i have read some of your other posts.  you seem to be a smart fellow, at least when it comes to electronics.  i just have to wonder why you would come to this thread and make such a comment.  it seems beneath your abilities.

if you have something constructive to say, please jump in.  otherwise, keep your counter productive comments to yourself.

tom
It's better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and prove it!