Scalar Waves - the source of Free Electrical Energy ??

[Sputnik-1]

There's alot here, but I can see now why it's so hard to
understand where 'Free Energy' devices get their electrical power
from. The mainstream Electrodynamics model does not fit the new
discoveries and advances being made, and the 'status quo' are
reluctant to alter the model to fit the new discoveries.

I have been 'sitting on the fence' until recently, but I'm
now TOTALLY CONVINCED that John Searl's SEG and IVG are genuine machines.

It looks like ALL electricity comes from the Time Domain via
Scalar Electromagnetic Waves (including electricity from  the
power grid and AA batteries, and anything else  inbetween).

It's just that FE devices draw the energy more efficiently than
conventional devices. The source is still the same.

Tom Bearden's youtube videos will point you in the right
direction on this. A must see!

This is an interview with Tom, and he explains in easy
terms, why the mainstream Electromagnetic model does not
handle the operation of the SEG, or any other 'Free Energy'
device.

Applied Scalar Wave Technology Tom Bearden
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Applied+Scalar+Wave+Technolo
gy+Tom+Bearden&aq=f

As Tom says, "Energy does not come from matter - matter
comes from energy".

Here are some other links along these same lines:

This is a nice intro to Scalar Wave Technology, and suggest
you read this before Going to Tom Bearden's website.
http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm

This guy, Bill Beaty, also explains alot of stuff missing from physics lessons:

http://amasci.com/miscon/voltage.html

This is a very usefull look at various Free Energy devices,
and I'm using it for reference purposes. This is Version
18.1 of a large eBook of some 2,200 pages, with a file size
of about 32 Mb.

http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/PJKBook.html

Here Don Kelly outlines the three types of free energy
devices:

YouTube - Rare Video - Free Energy Motors and Anomolous
Gravity Experiments Part 1/6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNN_tsC4cA4&playnext=1&list=PL9D92A197FEF
68940

In this 8 part video series Stan Deyo explains what gravity is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP4zQ4R8vJg

And Tom Bearden's website is here at:
http://www.cheniere.org/mission.html

I'm also noticing similarities cropping up in different FE
devices, like:

Dipoles - (that's basically what all FE machines are)

Bi-filar coils

Pulsed DC current

Tuned Resonant Circuits and Coils

Hi voltage

Rotation of a Physical Mass

There are three invisible fields, which are:

Gravitational fields, Magnetic fields, Voltage fields (E-fields).

This would explain the connection between FE devices and
their Anti-Gravity properties.

A couple of more links on Free Energy, including some
background theory:

http://depalma.pair.com/

http://www.brucedepalma.com/n-machine/

http://www.brucedepalma.com/adam-trombly/

So it looks like the rollers in John's SEG may be operating
like individual N-Machines - each being a Dipole. Due to the
configuration these N-Machine dipoles are working together
in unison, and pulling in ALOT more energy - like a
Electromagnetic Twister maybe?

[Feynman]

Scalar waves (longitudinal EM waves) are absolutely real , and were discovered by Tesla.  They have been suppressed by mainstream science , outside of black budget projects.  I suggest taking a look at my post over at OUR for more information...

Konstantin Meyl - Tesla Scalar Waves
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722

[Omnibus]

Scalar waves (longitudinal EM waves) are absolutely real , and were discovered by Tesla.  They have been suppressed by mainstream science , outside of black budget projects.  I suggest taking a look at my post over at OUR for more information...

Konstantin Meyl - Tesla Scalar Waves
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722

This is a very interesting topic but some have leveled pretty hard critique both regarding the theoretical background (http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_15_2_bruhn.pdf  or http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_16_3_bruhn.pdf) and the experimental setup offered by Meyl (http://www.gravitation.org/institute_of_gravity_research/Experiments/E-Abschlussbericht_Meyl-Experimentierset.pdf). I still cannot decide one way or the other about the veracity of these claims (there are so many other pressing things to do). So, someone who's really interested in this should really study he matter thoroughly and should come up with a conclusive statement about this matter.

Now, even a brief look at Bruhn's argument indicates that it cannot be conclusive despite the inherent claim that it is. The reason being, Bruhn's understanding (and that's the underlying thesis in his argument) that any claim in the area of electromagnetism should abide by Maxwell's equations. That should at once be considered unacceptable because Maxwell's equations cannot account, for instance, for the measured voltage in the unipolar (Faraday) generator. What is done as a palliative measure is to invoke the expression for the Lorentz force as a way to account for the observed voltage. Lorentz force, however, cannot be derived from Maxwell's equations and it should if those equations are to be considered descriptive of the electromagnetic phenomena. This is a serious flaw of Maxwell's equations to the extent of falsifying them. For now they are used just because it's the tradition to do so. Whether or not scalar wave theory or Weber's or maybe Hertz' theory can replace them (even Ampere's theory, available at the time when Maxwell's theory appeared, is more general than Maxwell's theory) remains to be seen. At this point electrodynamics is facing a dead-end and something urgently has to be done to get it back on the right and productive track.

[Sputnik-1]

This is a very interesting topic but some have leveled pretty hard critique both regarding the theoretical background (http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_15_2_bruhn.pdf  or http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_16_3_bruhn.pdf) and the experimental setup offered by Meyl (http://www.gravitation.org/institute_of_gravity_research/Experiments/E-Abschlussbericht_Meyl-Experimentierset.pdf). I still cannot decide one way or the other about the veracity of these claims (there are so many other pressing things to do). So, someone who's really interested in this should really study he matter thoroughly and should come up with a conclusive statement about this matter.

That's what I'm trying to do now, and offering to the forum my findings. Only been at this for the past two weeks seriously trying to get to the bottom of where the so-called 'Free Energy' comes from.

Now, even a brief look at Bruhn's argument indicates that it cannot be conclusive despite the inherent claim that it is. The reason being, Bruhn's understanding (and that's the underlying thesis in his argument) that any claim in the area of electromagnetism should abide by Maxwell's equations. That should at once be considered unacceptable because Maxwell's equations cannot account, for instance, for the measured voltage in the unipolar (Faraday) generator.

Right on.

What is done as a palliative measure is to invoke the expression for the Lorentz force as a way to account for the observed voltage. Lorentz force, however, cannot be derived from Maxwell's equations and it should if those equations are to be considered descriptive of the electromagnetic phenomena.

This is a serious flaw of Maxwell's equations to the extent of falsifying them. For now they are used just because it's the tradition to do so.

Apparently  written by Maxwell (1865)
- Heavyside (1880 curtailed model)
- Lorentz (1880's further symmetrized)

From Tom Beardens' website:

"It's also easy to see that, prior to Lorentz's ARBITRARY
symmetrical regauging of the Maxwell-Heaviside equations, those equations prescribe both EM systems in equilibrium with their active environment, and EM systems not in equilibrium with it.

The latter systems are permitted by the thermodynamics of open disequilibrium systems to perform five magic functions: (1) self-order, (2) self-oscillate or self-rotate, (3) output more
energy than the operator inputs (the active environment inputs
the rest of it), (4) power itself and its load (the active
environment inputs all the energy, like a windmill), and (5)
exhibit negentropy. That is a well-established thermodynamics.

Lorentz arbitrarily discarded all such open disequilibrium EM
systems in order to get simpler equations having analytical
solutions and not requiring numerical methods. So he simply
scrapped all the really interesting and challenging EM systems in Maxwell's theory. ARBITRARILY!"

And

"We now visualize the formation of waves of pure stress in the
spacetime medium (in the vacuum). These we call scalar EM waves,
Tesla waves, electrogravitational waves, longitudinal EM waves,
waves of pure potential, electrostatic/magnetostatic waves, and
zero-vector EM waves. All these terms are synonymous. Each sheds
its own particular light upon the nature of these waves or of
their original discoverer, Nikola Tesla." Tom Bearden

Whether or not scalar wave theory or Weber's or maybe Hertz' theory can replace them (even Ampere's theory, available at the time when Maxwell's theory appeared, is more general than Maxwell's theory) remains to be seen. At this point electrodynamics is facing a dead-end and something urgently has to be done to get it back on the right and productive track.

Tom Bearden points this out in his video - possibly number 7 or 8 of the series. He reckons new found results that are replicable - (The russians built a SEG with the same repeatable and observable results as obtained in John Searl's SEG's) means the current 'model' has to be modified - not scrapped - to incorporate those new found results into an updated model.

It's NOT a scientific method of research to discredit repeatable experiments just because they will not fit into the current model - which has been seriously pruned anyway.

For further reading I'm taking notes as I watch videos and read interesting stuff on the internet.

[Sputnik-1]

Scalar waves (longitudinal EM waves) are absolutely real , and were discovered by Tesla.  They have been suppressed by mainstream science , outside of black budget projects.  I suggest taking a look at my post over at OUR for more information...

Konstantin Meyl - Tesla Scalar Waves
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722

That looks good Feynman. I'll get my head round that ASAP