TPU-style flux cancellation , possible energetic anomalies in operation (video)

[e2matrix]

There are several message threads that have brought up this vid.  I asked a month or two ago about it and tried the essential setup.  You need to be pulling a continous 1000 watts or so to get anything useful and based on the responses I've had and seen elsewhere about it this is not free energy.  I decided that even if it was it is not a good idea since you have to be using a lot of energy to just possibly get a little extra.  I look at the bottom line with a setup like this.  Can it be self-running if looped?  Not in any way I can see. 

[turbo]

ono E2Matrix your looking at this the wrong way!

Imagine this sucker being in a 2 Gigawatt field already!
Preferably near or close to power lines.
And it is working the way around you only need to put in that tiny amount to get out the 10 amps!

Who said something about cancelling the flux?   DING DONG !!

[Feynman]

Yeah the flickering CFL was some weaksauce , but I like the idea of the opposing windings.

I'm going to buy a powdered iron toroid for my Boyce TPU replication -- perhaps tests with opposing primaries might be worthwhile.

[turbo]

The flickering is not due to low power but it is a result of frequency division!!
When this technique is used the frequency changes to 25Hz or 30Hz depending on the grid frequency..
This makes the bulb behave different.

[e2matrix]

marco,  do you think this is a useful way to get power?  OU?  I'm mostly going by what others told me here when I brought this up in another thread a while back.  Didn't the guy in the vid say it would mostly be useful in a place where you have a continuous fairly high power drain device running?  Have you tried a setup like this?