Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Alternative rotor design

Started by d3x0r, May 24, 2011, 11:40:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

d3x0r

I noticed that the muller replication is the same sort of principle as bedini, but instead of using one pole on the outside, both the north and south poles get used by turning the magnets sideways and putting coils on the sides instead of the outside.  (guess you could put a set of coils inside so you get outside/inside but anyhow)

the current rotor plate with circular magents reminds me of a SEG.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_Lk1VFgvUk

Except instead of having the magnets rigid in a plate, they are free to move... There's no way to get torque off of this configuration, but if power generation in a muller is greater than input, then you don't nesseciarly need torque - just apply the excess to a good torque generator like QM motor(?); then this rotor design has 0 parts to wear.

Unlike in the video, I think the coil design should be more like the muller motor being mounted above and below the SEG instead of as a C - I'm not sure, but I'm pretty certain that the middle is like the one direction you can move a magenet vs  acoil and not get a reaction - although because there is a large N/S field opposite to the roller's S/N maybe that causes a flux motion that can be picked up - haven't tested that yet.

d3x0r

I know - if the original replication doesn't work, not much point in enhancing it?

I did test with a stack of 3/8" magnets with a stack of 1/4" magents on them , rotating them about the length of the larger stack near my coil definatly registers a voltage... the voltage increases with a solid core, but also since it's not secured causes other problems; but the middle of a coil will pick up a signal if there is a larger magnet to provide ... what did they call it - biasing.

Hope

Thank you Eric for the ferrite core cutting tip it is a good method to use on this small scale replication.   After this build is made I have had an idea which will simply use magnetic field displacement in a solid state configuration.  This will preclude any moving parts.  My experience designing CNC circuits will be beneficial in sync firing electro magnets, forcing the field(s) to chase the electrons out the conductor(s).