Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Self-Oscillating Parallel Magnet (H) Device

Started by studentofhistory, June 19, 2011, 02:00:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sm0ky2

the addition of the Bridge-Coil, in this particular device,
adds a square-component to the Bridge Capacitor.
essentially, another variable magnet, but in this case, the (z) point in the center, is varied with magnetic intensity. This complicates the mathematics of the flux capacitor, but is minor, in terms of changes in capacitance. This second variable magnet drives an imbalanced capacitance circuit through core B. The bridge can no longer be treated as a single (or two identicle series) capacitor.

Instead, what you have is a capacitance between the bridge point B1 and the two (z) points at the top of core B. one bewteen the magnet, and one between the coil.
in series with another capacitance between the south bridge (B2) and bottom two (z) points. I'll call these capacitors CB1 and CB2

the flux capacitance of CB1 is the square of the change in flux intensity between the Bridge Coil, and the Coil on core B.

the flux capacitance of CB2 is the square of the change in flux intensity between the (X) point in the south core
    and the Coil on core B.
These are two entirely different numbers and i'll explain why.

At the top of the bridge, the addition of the bridge magnet acts as a capacitor between the permanent magnet, and the induced magnetic flux from the coil on core B.

At the bottom of the bridge, there is no bridge magnet, so the changes in magnetic flux are opposed by the flux intensity through core A. This causes a shift in the south (X) point, towards core A.
So the capacitance of the south Bridge is greater then that of the north bridge, but the change in flux intensity is sqrt of the change in the north Bridge.
The B coil, in this sense, is acting as a flux diode, passing flux in one direction from north Bridge to south Bridge. The magnetic current cannot flow in the other direction, because the pressure is greater on the north side.

and so the schematic would be shown as two variable flux capacitors of different value, in series, and if operated post-Bridge, the addition of the parallel flux capacitor.

secondary inputs for individual operation of the A coil and the Bridge coil gives further control over the function of the bridge flux capacitor.
I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

sm0ky2

assuming the coils are wired in series and can can actually be switched off at exactly the same time, so that the both fields collapse equally..... (a single transistor can perform the switching)

As the field collapses, the flux diode will operate in reverse, and direction of magnetic current will reverse. This induces a change in flux through the B Coil, and across the north Bridge, which combines with the collapse of the A field, through the A Coil.
Now, if this is operated post-Bridge, then the resulting change in flux from the Bridge combines with the change in flux through core A in a misproportional manner. the change in flux on the north side is not squared, while on the south side, it IS...
so the collapse of the field results in this case, with the field balancing out through the A Coil.

Although I did not personaly run tests while using a Bridge coil, while the bridge flux capacitor was used in post-Bridge operation....

If that is indeed the intended manner in which this device here is to operated, then there may be some credence to what it is claimed by the inventor - magnetically speaking.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Now as to the actual electrical current induced through the coils, energy required to do so, and electricity obtainable from the B Coil without disrupting the operation of the capacitor... i make no claims nor do i have any knowledge of these things. There are entirely too many variables to determine that without intensive mathematics, or performing tests on each type of core material, magnet strength, proportional size of core to bridge, type of coil, size/number of turns, input voltage/curent, and the list goes on and on.... To even speculate on the possibility of an "overunity" arrangement using this set-up, is beyond the scope of my knowledge..
I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.