Earth Is An Oil-Producing Machine — We're Not Running Out

[Floor]

I think the deep earth's crude oil generation might be at a rate
which is far slower than our current use / abuse of it.

I have no problem with using petroleum for some things, like maybe the
insulation on electrical wire, a few others ?  Such limited usage would
probably be environmentally sustainable.

But not for every thing we use under the sun. This is simply gross negligence
/ madness.

Perhaps the deep earth crude production rate could match a reasonable rate of use ?

[lancaIV]

Positive or negative ? Or for ones positive and others negative,bioatmospherical  ?

During day/during night (reverse photosynthesis)

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.n-tv.de/wissen/Erde-speichert-deutlich-mehr-Waerme-article22630030.html


Carbon and C02/CH4 and possible scrubbing and recycling to carbonfoam/carbon ink/carbon dots/graphit/graphene/artificial woodfoam

https://www.kit.edu/downloads/pi/PI_2019_090_Producing%20Graphene%20from%20Carbon%20Dioxide.pdf

https://newatlas.com/energy/gmg-graphene-aluminium-ion-battery/

as possible road-map


https://www.carbonrecycling.is/projects


is it economical more advantive to scrubb ppm C02 from air or from sea ?

https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/srccs_chapter6-1.pdf

in different (salt-)water deep ?

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.weka.de/einkauf-logistik/co2-ausstoss-ueberwiegend-natuerlichen-ursprungs/


According to this, only 3.5 percent of CO2 emissions are caused by humans, whereas 96.5 percent are of natural origin.


In sea near sub-surface vulcanoes ? Schlote/Chimneys  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrothermal_vent#Black_smokers_and_white_smokers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_scrubber



Seawater : salt-winning https://manoa.hawaii.edu/exploringourfluidearth/chemical/chemistry-and-seawater/salty-sea/weird-science-types-salts-seawater  ,CO2 scrubbing,drinkable water generation ,hydrogen/oxygen production 

Are ormes metals in sea-water to refind ? https://sites.google.com/eenergy.tv/home/patents





1 element: some gains potential


http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=WO&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=0133076&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en


Uses such as B. the production of drinking water, the production of hydrogen or methanol, the extraction of raw materials contained in seawater such as lithium etc. can be used. The implementation of high-energy processing or processing processes such as the production of aluminum from the raw materials or the production of steel by melting scrap can then take place in the wind turbine itself to the extent specified by the capacity of the float for the required raw materials or the processed product .


Street of Gibraltar sub-surface waterfall current,South-Groenland sub-surface waterfall


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20110119&CC=CN&NR=101952584A&KC=A

                                                           14.11.2012
https://www.bergstraesser-anzeiger.de/orte/bensheim_artikel,-bensheim-elektrischer-strom-aus-ebbe-und-flut-_arid,406869.html

                                                          Neue Chance                                                       
                                                            27.7.2020
https://www.bergstraesser-anzeiger.de/orte/bensheim_artikel,-bensheim-neue-chance-fuer-bensheimer-technik-_arid,1666781.html


https://web.archive.org/web/20150722065909/http://www.schiller-energy.com/

[onepower]

Carbon and C02/CH4 and possible scrubbing and recycling to carbonfoam/carbon ink/carbon dots/graphit/graphene/artificial woodfoam

It seems to be the same old sad story of intelligent people always having to clean up the mess of the not so intelligent.
The clueless fossil fuel industry doesn't have the intelligence nor the ambition to fix the problems they created.

I suspect they will do what they always do. Whine and complain how hard done by they are,
operate as long as they can then walk away from the mess they created.
So we should be clear there like very large children and at no point will they take any responsibility for there actions.
Were already seeing this happen as all the oil and gas corporations move there money,
declare bankruptcy and let the taxpayer pick up the clean up bill.

According to this, only 3.5 percent of CO2 emissions are caused by humans, whereas 96.5 percent are of natural origin.
In sea near sub-surface vulcanoes ? Schlote/Chimneys  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrothermal_vent#Black_smokers_and_white_smokers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_scrubber

Obviously it's nonsense.

If it was of natural origin then why have the greenhouse gasses risen so drastically in the last 150 years?.
Did nature just decide to start generating more greenhouse gasses because man did?.
There is also the fact that all chemical pollutants have risen in step with greenhouse gasses and nature didn't create them we did.
I get really tired of people lying that there not to blame for anything when it's pretty obvious we are.

In my opinion it's time for people to put there grown up pants on and start taking responsibility for there actions.

It's actually kind of strange, have you noticed that almost nobody ever pleads guilty in society or court.
I mean they could get caught red handed on video and still not be mature enough to take responsibility for there actions.
We seem to have bred a society of liars who are basically incapable of taking responsibility for there actions.
Apparently everyone is always innocent and nobody has ever done anything wrong, lol... priceless.

Maybe I could get the ball rolling...
I'm part of the problem, I drive trucks, tractors and equipment on my acreage, I operate commercial/industrial HVAC equipment, I generate a shit load of greenhouse gasses and pollution like most people.
In a world of cowards afraid to admit they did anything wrong I do it all the time. I'm generally wrong about many things but I'm always trying to do better.

Regards
AC

[lancaIV]

onepower, the earth GHG balance natural (included human work)source/sink :


here especially https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNLUzqW8IuA

Carbon dioxide is the most common greenhouse gas, responsible for about three-quarters of emissions.


It can remain in the atmosphere for thousands of years.


Methane, the main component of natural gas, doesn't stay in the atmosphere as long as CO2—about 12 years—


but it is at least 84 times more potent over two decades.



A CO2 emission all sources per annum ppm /B emission sink ppm per annum = A-B : balance in-/de-crease ppm CO2 per annum

https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-global-fossil-fuel-emissions-up-zero-point-six-per-cent-in-2019-due-to-china

oceans as CO2 sink https://www.carbonbrief.org/scientists-solve-ocean-carbon-sink-puzzle


           as CO2 emission source


https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/greenhouse-gases-lurk-in-oceans-could-make-warming-far-worse




Obviously it's nonsense.


If it was of natural origin then why have the greenhouse gasses risen so drastically in the last 150 years?
Did nature just decide to start generating more greenhouse gasses because man did?
There is also the fact that all chemical pollutants have risen in step with greenhouse gasses and nature didn't create them we did
I get really tired of people lying that there not to blame for anything when it's pretty obvious we are.


the source sink in small,encapsuled :


A Champagne-wine bottle
the bottle filling
the bottle enclosing
please,not shaking and not in hot atmosphere
or : blopp !




About savings in CO2 production/consume/savings :


https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/default/files/themes/strategies/consultations/doc/2009_03_27_future_of_transport/20090408_eabev_%28scientific_study%29.pdf


wheel-to-wheel-efficiency comparison


without first poste April 13, 2021, 12:46:09 PM  gun-engine/Arakelian/Chambrin technology

[onepower]

onepower, the earth GHG balance natural (included human work)source/sink :
here especially https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNLUzqW8IuA
Carbon dioxide is the most common greenhouse gas, responsible for about three-quarters of emissions.
It can remain in the atmosphere for thousands of years.
Methane, the main component of natural gas, doesn't stay in the atmosphere as long as CO2—about 12 years—
but it is at least 84 times more potent over two decades.

I'm well aware of the science however that doesn't change the fact that all levels of pollution are on the rise and most are associated with fossil fuels. 

Look at all the polluted water, air and massive land fills full of garbage.
They now say there is no area on the planet not saturated with micro plastics made from fossil fuels.
Were literally eating and drinking substantial amounts of toxic plastic because it's now in everything.

Personally I think most are peddling the notion that CO2 is the only problem to distract from all the larger issues associated with
fossil fuels and there are many. Like the fact that most pipelines are leaking and the oil and gas companies have been lying about it.
I talked with many people in the industry and they said half the fifty year old pipe is rotten and nobody knows what to do about it.
They can't patch the leaks fast enough and they can't afford to replace it so they just let it leak. It's a gong show of gross incompetence...

Regards
AC