Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Is water a battery?

Started by phantomcow2, October 07, 2007, 09:38:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

readyakira

I am no science wiz. and I would not ever claim to be.  I did learn alot of basics in school(they don't tech alot of the stuff I learned anymore), But I have to agree with farahday.  I don't think Mr. Meyers understood completley why his invention worked, but I do believe it to work to the intended result.  It does use resources, in this case water thus, it does have a "loss" of energy. I  just believe the thinking about why and what energy is lost is the part where the confusion is.  I completely agree with energy in can not be less then energy out, I just think maybe what is equal between energy types is off, or, the fact that certain processes cause an atraction of other sources is often overlooked.

In the case of Mr. meyers you are in need of adding water, or it would have been a self contained, no water needing system.  Thus the energy loss has to be in the water itself some how.  I would be willing to bet once the world understands sub-atomic particles to the higher degree then we do now ( science is looking into things like what makes an electron what it is) that we will become aware of a whole new level on laws, and thus stans machines will make much more sense. 

I watched a show the other day on Science channel that talked about energy's different forms, and the theory's on what makes the simplest forms what they are, I'll tell ya what, it was some of the most amazing but believeable things I have heard in a long time.
I guess maybe I don't believe in an "OverUnity" per se, but rather a "unity" that is so close to perfect that humans as our knowledge presently accepts, has no reasonable/practical way of measuring it.

I do not believe a patent makes a theory right, but rather just means a device worked as intended, not nessecarily for the reasons stated.  Thus stans WFC for example did work, and just some simple science would tell you it could work, just not the way he explained.  As far as I understand ( and please correct me if I am wrong) It was not perpetual, nor was it completly efficient, but it is much more efficient then what the world presently accepts and the norm. 

PS:  I hate when I get on these rants as I don't get much sleep when I do this :P