Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Can someone show me a design that has worked?

Started by Roen Hayden, January 14, 2008, 03:25:46 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

PolyMatrix

Computer programmers in low-level code use indirect reference as a one of the language tools that are available to them. Presumably indirect reference is not a new language concept. It is quite clear in the other thread where I get the patent information. In the lecture by Tom Valone, sorry I cannot remember who posted that link, he actually mentions 3 patients of which he says he considers the Capasso the most important. So by my associative dyslexic thinking patents becomes patent. Since this is the Internet and the time one allows to considering exactly what one has said and how another might perceive it is reduced to a minimum, it is usual to allow posters a lot of leeway in what they say.

I apologise for writing in a compressed form of reasoning.

Was or is overunity considered impossible 11 years ago?
Were people accepting that it is/was possible we could tap into ZPE/??? or use these sources of energy? (Equinox 1995, ââ,¬Å"It runs on waterââ,¬Â, holds an explanation of ZPE for the ordinary man).
Are there standard methods of working out the energy input into a machine and do they normally consider background noise to be one of them?
Is it not usual to consider background noise and radiation as part of experimental error?
In the conversation between NASSA scientist and T.Valone does it not seem that Valone considers background noise to be part of ZPE.
Hence the logic of saying "patent verifying overunity"

What is a person other than a bunch of ideas in a bag of water held together by minerals?

What I am guilty of is not posting a link to what I was talking about

In history it has been recorded as usual for at least two people to have the same controversial inventive ideas. The person who gets the most noise from the public is the one who is usually attributed with coming up with it first. Personally I do not care who thought of it. All my thoughts once expressed are public property for the virus infesting the planet known as 'Earth' by the virus.

PolyMatrix

@Bessler007
Finally to quote yourself

Quote from: Bessler007 on January 20, 2008, 04:10:15 AM
What hasn't happened from the believers in free energy (FE) or those of over unity (OU) is not relevant to a discussion about zero point energy (ZPE).  I'm not sure why you'd want to change the subject to that.  Maybe  your grasping at straws.


  •     " Zero point energy is the energy that remains after a substance is cooled to absolute zero. "   Dr. Hal Puthoff

I'd submit to you the energy required to attain those temperatures puts any application of ZPE well outside any practical application of FE or OU.