Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Best output: fewer big or more small magnets?

Started by capthook, March 11, 2008, 08:35:11 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

capthook

Thanks for the replies!

So - as the larger magnets will cause larger drag - to keep the RPMs constant (with the same power input)- the air gap will have to be increased.  Doing this will result in about the same output as the smaller magnets with a smaller air gap.

With a device having a maximum attainable RPM's, once this level is reached, smaller magnets will - in effect - be like adding to the RPMs. With smaller magnets, will the greater frequency of the changing magnetic flux provide enough extra output to compensate for the smaller magnetic field proving to be superior to lower frequency, larger/stronger magnets?

ie: large mags 1+1=2 : small mags 1+1>2 (because of frequency)
(similar to ->  iron core 1+1=2 :  hollow/or amorphous core 1+1>2  (all variables considered))

or does 1+1=2 no matter what you do?  More amp turns in a coil = larger drag = slower rmps = larger power input needed = larger magnets = larger drag = larger air gap = .................. aaaaaaaaagh!!!!!!!!!!!!   :P :P :P

Thus: it doesn't matter what size, because all things considered - it will be the same in the end??
It seems tweaking here and there should matter!  With a fixed surface area to place magnets - it should figure magnet size would be a variable to optimize.....just like core size/material, wire size, amp turns etc. can be optimized.................
Or is magnet size just one variable that can't be 'cause 1+1=2 no matter? 

CH