Free Energy From Wave Fields LETS DO IT!!!

[nul-points]

hi all

thanks for converting & posting the PDF e2m, good work - and good find by infringer also

i think i saw a paper a couple years back which explained about the additive effect of superimposed coherent waves (and it originated from Eastern Europe) but i don't think it had as much detail as this paper

interestingly this appears to be the inverse of Don Smith's explained principle behind say his 'suitcase circuit' where he states that many receiving 'aerials' (coils) close to 1 transmitting coil all receive the same full power as a single aerial would, ie. that there is no loss or 'dilution'  of the transmitted power once the transmitted signal is in the magnetic domain

Smith states that the turns of a loosely wound 'primary'  positioned above but slightly separated from the 'secondary' acts like an array of aerials each transmitting to each turn of the secondary

if that is true, then could we implement the antennae in this paper's principle also with coils like Smith does - only in this case have multiple coils fed in parallel as the 'primary' Tx antennae and a single Rx antenna as the 'secondary'?

eg., say, three air-cored coils next to each other, all standing on end,  the middle one is the Rx receiver 'secondary' the outer two are the Tx antennae or 'primaries', connected in parallel?

or a ring of 4 Tx coils connected in parallel, around a single Rx 'secondary' in the middle? (all coils standing on end)


@Gyula
in that line on p36 of the PDF the value for ξis calculated to be equal to an expression and the author says that part of the expression, ie. (delta-A over ((lambda-zero)squared)) is equal to 1

therefore ξ is equal to the other part of the expression which is (4-pi over 3), so ξ > 1    (ie., approx 4.4)

hope this helps!

all the best
sandy

[gyulasun]

hi Gyula,  The .doc file had a symbol as shown in the copy and paste of the screen capture (jpeg) below.  Maybe it is in a font that's not installed in your computer?  Not sure but you can see it in the .jpeg.  The same symbol you'll see in the .jpeg was also on page 44 where you mentioned.

Hi, 

Thanks for showing the doc file relevant part, so you see a equation symbol = where I can see only a small square symbol in my MS Word. Because I meant the place where the equation symbol is between the ξ and 1, ok? 

Member null-points wrote and I fully agree that mathematically there cannot be an equation symbol there because the 4Pi/3 is greater than 1, so ξ cannot be equal to 1,  this is why I also mentioned the "greater than" symbol, >  as a possibility in my previous letter, ok?  This is why I think it maybe a misprint.

Thanks,  Gyula

[e2matrix]

Gyula,  that makes sense.  I misunderstood exactly which symbol you referred to as I just assumed the '=' sign would be viewable but the other one might require a special font.  I didn't even try running the math in that paper but I do understand what you said above.  I'm a little hazy on the details but wasn't there something stated on the web site about needing to install a certain math program of something needed to properly view the document?  I didn't bother since it looked okay.  I wonder if that has any relevance to this situation. 

[gyulasun]

Yes, there was a certain math program recommended to install indeed and then the symbol in question may have been seen correctly, I do not know.

I still think the = equation symbol cannot be there, otherwise the energy anomaly is not an anomaly, at least not mathematically, for 4Pi/3 > 1, hence ξ cannot be equal to 1, ok?