Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnetic motor?

Started by helioc, June 16, 2009, 06:49:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

magnetman12003

Take any two like magnets and use a meter to measure the gauss of each magnet. 

Then tape both magnets together in a REPEL mode and keep them that way for a month.

Untape them and measure the gauss of each magnet now.

This should tell you about how long any REPEL  based permanent magnet device will keep on working.

Do the same as above but use an attraction mode and see what the gauss reading is after a month.

So much for the Perendev motors longevity.

lumen

QuoteWhen you do measurements you must look at the force versus distance in any possible configuration. It is easy to be fooled by a great force versus a weak force when you do not consider the "active area" where the force is present. A weak force over a great area, can represent as much energy as a super force within a very small area. In the same magnetic setup, these two alternatives are allways the same.

I have already tested this setup using two different methods and each test involved reading the force at .05" through the entire range of both sets of moving magnets. The data is valid and does show OU by 15 to 20%. This is enough to lift 1kg .05" at every transaction.
If a rotary device was built using ten setups around a track then at 3000 RPM it would generate enough output to lift 1kg 25" each second. This would be using only small .5 x 1.5 x .125 magnets.

Low-Q

Quote from: lumen on June 25, 2009, 07:30:46 PM
I have already tested this setup using two different methods and each test involved reading the force at .05" through the entire range of both sets of moving magnets. The data is valid and does show OU by 15 to 20%. This is enough to lift 1kg .05" at every transaction.
If a rotary device was built using ten setups around a track then at 3000 RPM it would generate enough output to lift 1kg 25" each second. This would be using only small .5 x 1.5 x .125 magnets.
Hi,

I am just very sceptic. Are you sure you haven't missed anything? So you have measured the force and counterforce at every 0.05o? I assume you have done that in a simulator. If so, what simulator have you used?

Vidar

lumen

I agree! magnet motors are impossible so there is good reason to be skeptical.
I am skeptical myself, but I will continue to attempt to build a device that would run on this principal.
The testing was not done in a simulator. I use a digital scale and a mechanical setup to test any principals or concepts that I believe have merit.
I also have CNC machines so it's not a problem for me to build testing devices at nearly no cost.





Low-Q

Quote from: lumen on June 26, 2009, 10:38:20 AM
I agree! magnet motors are impossible so there is good reason to be skeptical.
I am skeptical myself, but I will continue to attempt to build a device that would run on this principal.
The testing was not done in a simulator. I use a digital scale and a mechanical setup to test any principals or concepts that I believe have merit.
I also have CNC machines so it's not a problem for me to build testing devices at nearly no cost.
At least it is very funny to engineer things. I look forward to see your gear when you're finish. Then we can give it an eyeball, and figure out why it don't work. ;)