water holding charg

[timallard]

Nice input, thanks.

To explain the 2.411Ghz, it relates to the circumference of the oxygen atom's covalent radius, if you inject that frequency the signal travels on the outer shell and adds energy, that affects the shared electrons.

Some of the lower freq harmonics are known to produce odd or unexpected results such as the fogging, the 1.83Mhz signal, which divides pretty much as an integer into the 2.411Ghz so is a harmonic, but, likely too low to really blow the molecule apart as the higher freq does have more power and is related to the relativistic forces more than a fundamental or lower harmonic.

I've got the circuits but they need to drive magnets to create the plasma at that freq to basically disassemble the fuel molecules instead of having the volatility of the fuel vaporize to "mix" the fuel on the way into the manifold, so, working on the coils that can operate at that freq without being too lossy.

The reason for that freq is to separate things, it's also to keep them separated beyond the Van der Waals radius so they don't reassemble, at lower freq they have time to snap back to a much larger degree so that takes away from the possible efficiency.

The magnetic field is polarized so will drive free oxygen to one pole and the hydrogen to the other by their intrinsic charge, much like electrolysis but not. This won't be a perfect separation by any means but will be far more efficient than standard electrolysis and can be done to the carbon atom so hopefully will blast the hydrocarbon chains as well, that freq is 1.895Ghz so I'm working on how to combine them and may discover some tricks, exploring the numbers to find harmonics that may do both.

I was checking out the absorption bands of water vapor at 25C to get some more clues, nothing solid on that yet.

Since this is a new project and I don't have much design time in yet and it's already shown to be valid at explaining the fogging as a harmonic of the 2.411Ghz, kinda' stoked, pretty sure it'll work out and may offer about 30% better fuel burning than relying on volatility to disperse the liquid fuel into a gas on the way to the cylinder.

Thanks for the links and freq chart, it all helps ... will post when I get to conclusions or find a good plan for dragging it into a free-energy concept, there may be a net gain at the correct freq if I can get resonance into it, may be higher than what I'm using so I keep that in mind and the chart will help me map it, I was using x-ray freq at first, may still be useful as they are powerful, haven't extended harmonics up yet ...

cheers,

tom