3 treadmill motors a switch and a lightbulb

[sparks]

  The advantage I see is that a motor produces torque in two directions.  One is shaft torque the other is stator torque.
If we "bolt down" the stator using a load then we have increased efficiency.  It will not cost any more wattage to drive the stator counter to the rotor.    In the diagram the torque splitter armature is double shafted.  This spins normally in opposition to the   ts stator.  The ts armature is supported with additional pillowblock bearings.  This allows the stator to rotate counter to the armature.  A pulley is mounted both to one end of the armature and on the outside diameter of the stator/motor housing.  The stator will revolve in one direction while the rotor will revolve in the other.  As you load the torque splitter stator down through the drive dynamo output the ts armature will begin to drive the output generator.  The more load on the drive dynamo the more "bolted down" the ts motor appears.

[Judges]

Quite clear to me.
You're harvesting the bolted down torque.
Wouldn't the RPM halve? (along with input Amps?)
Then increase as more "bolted down" is applied?

It should make a heck of interesting electric
motor/generator,especially with today's bearing technology,probably could be built as a single unit?
if 'bolted down' is a group of coils?
j.
note: I don't get to come to this forum that often.usually twice a week or so. I say this because I wouldn't want anyone thinking I was not answering,Thanks,I knew you would understand.