New permanent magnet motor on youtube from Roobert33

[mscoffman]

This idea was discussed extensively months ago in this forum. I wish someone could
dig out the thread. It is wonderful that someone put it in flesh and blood. Good craftsmanship indeed.
...

@Omnibus;

One of them at least is here Web Link;

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8398.0

the other Web Link;

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8867.0

---

@All

Even if this doesn't work at first...there is good chance it could be made to
work by cutting the momentum energy required to move the top bar in half.
Beside friction, it's the only real load on the rotation.

I previously said;

a) You can cut the energy required to move the top
piece in half by having two *synchronized* wheels
of opposite polarity running some distance away
from one another. When one wheel shoves the N
pole of the top piece away from it's sticky spot
it also shoves the S pole of the top piece into place
on the other synchronized wheel. The wheels each
makes one power turn, then cams the magnet away,
then one turn idling. That should do it.

It would be a good application for one of those low friction
"banded bearing" mechanisms.

The little flippy magnet at the bottom probably acts as a
gravity based damper against the cam actuation.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[WilbyInebriated]

Sorry if a bit lost on this one guys.

So this Rob you have been talking to on the phone, is Roobert33 who posted the video?

Cheers

Sean.

i'm a bit lost on this one too sean, but for a different reason. i was under the impression that markdansie was roobert33 because of this post:

Hi Bill,
I sent the video out to many of my friends around the world including Sterling. It was part of 101 sceptics. Everyone passed with flying colours
Except Sterling...you got to love the guy.
mark

but i'm pretty sure the guy chet and omni talked to is not roobert33.

[nievesoliveras]

There is another replication here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwLwEs0iu7U&feature=related

Update:
I went to the link on the clip and found this:

[Omnibus]

@CLaNZeR,

The guy I spoke to was not @Robert33. He was the person who answered the phone when I called the number @ramset gave. No connection with @Robert33 whatsoever.

@nievesoliveras,

You certainly noticed the person from the link (some Jason George) says that perpetual motion is "clearly not possible" and the pictured device will not work "when analyzed". Where's the analysis, though? Rob, the person I spoke to yesterday, for one, insists it works when actually built. He said he had one working and that wasn't with much effort or precision.

[nievesoliveras]

I am neutral on this one.
The only problem we have had with this self running devices is that we spend a lot of money just to see if it work.

The great thing would be if someone has the materials already and can test if it works without having a great loss of funds.

Jesus