Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



New permanent magnet motor on youtube from Roobert33

Started by hartiberlin, November 17, 2010, 05:47:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

Quote from: Qwert on November 29, 2010, 09:55:10 AM
Hi.
My small observation: all guys here seem to neglect the small contraption at the bottom of the original R33 machine: it is never seen in any replica. I think, it gives a momentary "boost" to the wheel.

Yeah, the role of that detail is unclear. Seems like what you get as boost is due to spending of the earlier produced energy. That's how it appears superficially but there may be more to it.

maw2432

One positive thought about the magnet at the bottom.... Maybe it is a control to slow the motor down since it might speed up too much and break....  if it really works.   

Low-Q

Wonder why R33 used fake magnets in the V-track - made of CNC machined steel rods. I also wonder why the seesaw in the very bottom wasen't affected by the "magnets" at all, except when it was activated by the cam - it should stick instantly into the "magnets" in the V-track. I also wonder why some still believe this V-track was a working one which is worth replicating.

Just wondering.

Low-Q

Quote from: phild on November 29, 2010, 08:24:35 AM
Just a quick idea.

I found this vid on YouTube, please take a look and then read the on...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VN6KWM8Rbc&feature=youtube_gdata_player

As you can see (If I'm making sense of the vid), the ball runs up a slight incline and because the ramp is quite far apart, it is able to drop out (via gravity) and continue rolling.

The point is: that the ball drops out at a height which is higher then its starting point.   This would suggest that the track could be bent around in a gentle curve, decreasing in height, until its at the starting point of the ramp where it might start again.

Thoughts?
Let me apply some facts about such devices:

The energy that appears to "pop" up from nowhere, are actually the work done by the hand in advance. What most people doesn't know (Or just don't admit), is when releasing the steel ball further away from the ramp, it will repell and go backwards. Everyone who have tried this SMOT ramp knows this well - me included. This repelling force is easily overcomed by the hand which place the steel ball close enough to be attracted. This force over the required distance to get close enough to the ramp is the energy you need to apply in order for the steel ball to climb that hill in the first place. So what to the eye appears to be OU are not OU at all.

What seams like to be a potential difference when it regards the hight is also misunderstood. Yes the hight in altitude are greater at the end of the ramp, but the magnetic field which is affecting the ball, is virtually leveling out the difference in hight because it is more attracting at the end than in the bottom. Also when the ball falls through the ramp at the end, it does not fall at 9.81ms^2, but less due to the attraction to the magnetic ramp which slows down the acceleration towards the ground.

The above facts are the very reason why such ramps cannot be looped back. A succesful loop back are depending on overunity. No overunity will not make a successful closed loop. Also for these reasons there has never been a single video on Youtube of a successful closed loop.

EDIT: Furthermore; The ramp is also working like a hoist which exchange weight pr hight with time. It require less force but more time to roll a 1 ton car up a gentle uphill, but if the end of the hill are suddenly terminated into a steep hill, none are able to keep that car from falling down. SMOTs are nice tricks, but not OU.

Vidar

Omnibus

Quote from: Low-Q on November 29, 2010, 05:00:49 PM
Let me apply some facts about such devices:

The energy that appears to "pop" up from nowhere, are actually the work done by the hand in advance. What most people doesn't know (Or just don't admit), is when releasing the steel ball further away from the ramp, it will repell and go backwards. Everyone who have tried this SMOT ramp knows this well - me included. This repelling force is easily overcomed by the hand which place the steel ball close enough to be attracted. This force over the required distance to get close enough to the ramp is the energy you need to apply in order for the steel ball to climb that hill in the first place. So what to the eye appears to be OU are not OU at all.

What seams like to be a potential difference when it regards the hight is also misunderstood. Yes the hight in altitude are greater at the end of the ramp, but the magnetic field which is affecting the ball, is virtually leveling out the difference in hight because it is more attracting at the end than in the bottom. Also when the ball falls through the ramp at the end, it does not fall at 9.81ms^2, but less due to the attraction to the magnetic ramp which slows down the acceleration towards the ground.

The above facts are the very reason why such ramps cannot be looped back. A succesful loop back are depending on overunity. No overunity will not make a successful closed loop. Also for these reasons there has never been a single video on Youtube of a successful closed loop.

Vidar

Complete nonsense.