Splitting the electron stream

[ramset]

I often envy your smarts!
I think to myself geeeezzz ,what a gift!

And then I see it comes at a cost,somehow you have no real peace

You can't stop thinking,you have to learn to relax , chill,shut the brain off
You're thinking way to much, you'll pull a brain muscle!

Somehow you see me as ,multiple persons?

I am now and have always been Chet Kremens , My real name,I go by no monikers ,handles etc.

I am sorry If you feel I have offended you somehow,by being disingenuous

I really like your contributions,and have been struggling to understand them.

Chet

[ramset]

Speaking of your contributions!
The Marinov Motor,
seems like an old promise has been kept![by you]

can you share some of your understanding on this??
Please??
Thank you
Chet

[quarktoo]

Speaking of your contributions!
The Marinov Motor,
seems like an old promise has been kept![by you]

can you share some of your understanding on this??
Please??
Thank you
Chet

I kept my promise when I showed how you can polarize a chain of water molecules and experimentally demonstrate the length of time it takes to for a water molecule to rotate 180 degrees. As simple as the experiment was, nobody was smart enough to appreciate the beauty in the simplicity. - You evil lying worm!

I have most of what it takes on the shelf to prove what electricity is and to prove perpetual motion - that all there is, is perpetual motion. Problem is, most people don't have the abstract thinking skills to disconnect from their "local" perception of the universe.

ATTACHED is a nice paper on some aspects of the subject of EM:

Note - Page 6 mentions A-B effect and causality of fields?

Note - Page 7 how Hertz introduced velocity - acceleration?

Note - Page 8 how there must be two different photons? Just because something moves at the speed of light does not mean it is a photon. I posted something a few weeks ago about how a photon is NOT the force carrier of the electromagnetic field as is postulated. There is another particle and that particle is an empty spaceand subsequent shock wave created during mass to atomic energy conversion.

Note  - Page 11 how he tries to introduce imaginary numbers to validate the equations? Maybe that results from an imaginary understanding of electricity? They do after all still regard electricity as either a phenomenon or a story that can't hold water. ...and maybe all that comes from an imaginary understanding of what a particle is? Me thinks that.

Note - Page 13 The closing remarks are precious. He is a smart person that has done his homework correcting other people's homework. Until people understand that electricity is mass to atomic energy conversion, until people understand that the time function must be a part of every physical law, THE PHYSICAL MODELS ARE ALREADY NEBULOUS.

A science paper that shows the mistakes is every bit as important than one that shows an effect or creates a physical law. Had people like Einstein been ignored, had Rockafeller not taken control of academics, we would probably not be in this mess.

When you hide the effects of acceleration to prevent people from understanding free energy devices, you need a lot of glue made of bullshit to keep that physical house of cards from falling. Imaginary numbers and non relative equations don't make good glue.

It seems insane to create new areas of science rather than correct the mistakes of the past. It does not disrespect the scientist of the past, it simply acknowledges that knowledge is also relative. As time progresses, knowledge is squared unless the corporate resistance of personal greed or ego are introduced into the human experiment. The greed of money and ego killed the hundredth monkey of humanity.

Who will be the one to show how Rife split a light wave and explain the double slit experiment relegating quantum science to the trash bin and exposing those that bought into it as insane believers? Would the insane believers listen? Try telling a magical thinking religious person that God is the universe. Then offer experimental proof of that and see if it changes anything.

On a larger canvas, me thinks the reason we can only account for 4.5% of the light in the universe is because there is a .5% measurement error and we live in a two octave resonance of the universal wave. I suspect the universe is not as big as they claim, but we are actually smaller then they realize. It is all relative in a universal transmission with at least 20 gears. There was no big bang, we live in a solid mass that varies in time and most of that time exceeds the local speed of light in two directions.

Tesla made a device (dark rings) that ABSORBED LIGHT! ABSORBED LIGHT! ABSORBED LIGHT! ABSORBED LIGHT!

Um, did you see that absorbed light part?

[ramset]

Envy.......................
is that a sin?

Yes Perpetual motion is all there is in this universe.

Q
Quote
Try telling a magical thinking religious person that God is the universe
-------------------
I agree,but my universe has lips!

------------------
Absorbes light??
Holy crap?? How? Consumes?

Chet

[sigma16]

When Paul Dirac (physicist) postulate "virtual photons", he said they were "virtual" so as not to violate conservation of energy and get a noose around his neck.


Ever hear of anti-photons?