Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


MODIFIED BEDINI SALE ON EBAY

Started by magnetman12003, December 17, 2010, 06:42:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

ElectricGoose

Quote from: magnetman12003 on December 18, 2010, 11:46:23 PM
Check out the below link and follow from there.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110625717055

Unless someone has made an exact replication and can prove differently I believe free energy has been liberated  by using a single 1.5 AA alkaline battery as means to trip it.
Proceeds go to charity.

1)  I agree with happyfunball on every one of his points so I won't rehash (too much)  LOL.
2)  Show this thing running REAL heavy inductive loads like a filament lamp not pathetic led's.  LED lamps are very misleading as we all know that you can run leds with high potential and low amps while still leaving some impressive overflow for the multimeter demonstration.  Enough said there.
3)  I have seen enough of the circuit on youtube to know that is nothing.  Firstly it's not his idea which is just insulting to the real inventor and secondly this isn't running in perpetuity.
4)  He provides no real data just some vague comments of it draining a 1.5 volt battery over 3 hours or whatever....and??? ...what about the load data??....yeh...if you put too much info it would show it to be useless THATS WHY!!

Charity my ass.  I knew of a guy that labelled his beer fridge a charity so that he felt comfortable telling everyone "all proceeds go to charity"  LOL.  This fella probably has the same white lie philosophy.

Terrible.

E-Goose

happyfunball

Quote from: ElectricGoose on December 19, 2010, 12:34:12 AM
I knew of a guy that labelled his beer fridge a charity so that he felt comfortable telling everyone "all proceeds go to charity"

That's a good one

TinselKoala

From the answers to the questions on the ebay listing:

QuoteA: The starting "OUTPUT" voltage across the 4 lamps measured 68.6 volts and the current .28ma So we are looking at .019208 watts across 4 lighted lamps. A 6 Hour 28 minute run time resulted.

So let's run the numbers. Take the "starting OUTPUT" and just assume it's constant for the whole 6.5 hours. How much ENERGY has been put through the lighted lamps?

I get this:  0.02 Watts for (6.5)(60)(60)seconds, or 468 Joules.

What do you get?

Now, how much ENERGY is in a typical modern AA battery? Let's just use an ordinary one off the shelf which has 2000 mA-H capacity, and let's use the ENDING voltage of the battery used in the device: 1.25 volts.

So I get this:
The battery contains (1.25)(2000) milliWatt-hours of energy, or
(1.25)(2000)(60)(60) milliWatt-seconds of energy, or
9000 Joules.

So the energy content of the AA battery is about 18 or 20 times greater than the energy output of the device, totalled up over the 6.5 hours of runtime.

It is always possible that I have misplaced a decimal point or divided when I should have multiplied or something, so I encourage everyone to repeat my calculations, just in case this device is 500 percent efficient instead of only 5 percent.

Meanwhile, I am going to have another cup of coffee, with a stout shot of brandy in it, because it's cold in here and my Ainslie heater doesn't seem to be working properly.

osiris

Quote from: TinselKoala on December 19, 2010, 09:38:24 AM
From the answers to the questions on the ebay listing:

So let's run the numbers. Take the "starting OUTPUT" and just assume it's constant for the whole 6.5 hours. How much ENERGY has been put through the lighted lamps?

I get this:  0.02 Watts for (6.5)(60)(60)seconds, or 468 Joules.

What do you get?

Now, how much ENERGY is in a typical modern AA battery? Let's just use an ordinary one off the shelf which has 2000 mA-H capacity, and let's use the ENDING voltage of the battery used in the device: 1.25 volts.

So I get this:
The battery contains (1.25)(2000) milliWatt-hours of energy, or
(1.25)(2000)(60)(60) milliWatt-seconds of energy, or
9000 Joules.

So the energy content of the AA battery is about 18 or 20 times greater than the energy output of the device, totalled up over the 6.5 hours of runtime.

It is always possible that I have misplaced a decimal point or divided when I should have multiplied or something, so I encourage everyone to repeat my calculations, just in case this device is 500 percent efficient instead of only 5 percent.

Meanwhile, I am going to have another cup of coffee, with a stout shot of brandy in it, because it's cold in here and my Ainslie heater doesn't seem to be working properly.

i got a good laugh...   :D

i cant imagine anyone foolish enough to try and sell them on ebay ...  i got a warning ...  it wasent friendly ...

hummmm.

so i abide by the warning .. 
i dont sell my work .. i present it public .. it represents ownership...
origonality ..is hard to find.. but so are good inventors that can spell well  ;D

osiris

TinselKoala

The fellow's two YT videos are "comments disabled".

So it's likely that he fully understands what he's doing, and since he's stating his power figures ... well, if somebody wants to pay 500 dollars for a kludged-up pulse motor when you can do the same thing with no moving parts (see Steorn !!) I suppose that's up to them.

Let the buyer beware !!