Strategy Ruminations

[Omnibus]

Many of you have been following my studies last summer on power balances in transformers, coils and what not and finally of a simple RC circuit. I don't remember what the link to these studies was (maybe someone can help) but the gist was that both theoretically and experimentally it was determined that under certain circumstances (certain voltage offsets) the studies devices are OU. Aside from difficulties some have with the theory itself reproducing these findings experimentally meets with insurmountable difficulties among the members of the forum mainly because of the super expenses needed to get the equipment needed. The expenses are way beyond what almost everybody here can afford.

Now, a great way to reproduce the claims I put forth turned out to be a widely used simulation program called PSpice. Its student version (enough for the studies at hand) is free, anybody can download it and see for himself the validity of the OU claim. There shouldn't be an excuse any more that conditions, expense, infrastructure etc. don't allow for this OU effect to be reproduced independently. Note, this is the only instance so far whereby OU is conclusively proven in a solid-state electric device and, as seen, OU is inherent in the very essence of theory of electricity. I am preparing more texts demonstrating OU inherent in theory other than theory of electricity and will post these texts separately when the time comes.

I've discussed privately the findings I'm presenting here with friends and I'm contemplating to post them also on @poynt99's overunityresearch.com as well as Sean's(CLaNZeR's) overunity.org.uk but haven't decided yet mainly to have the discussions focused in one place. I've traditionally posted here in this forum, the earlier results are posted here (although somewhere in another thread) so I'll start here and then we'll see how it goes.

The main goal is to make these studies mainstream because, as I've said more than once, there is no private money or support that can compete with the finances, infrastructure, societal impact etc. of the Academia which nowadays is usurped by forces promoting sheer nonsense instead of supporting studies that would benefit humanity.

I'm attaching here three files of data obtained by PSpice of a schematic shown below. You may see that the analysis of Pout/Pin is not based on what PSpice uses for the purpose but is very clearly specified and presented outside of PSpice -- in Excel. This is extremely important because, as I've demonstrated earlier, integration and all kinds of additional approximation procedures do nothing else but obscure the effect. Thus, the fewer arithmetic operations the fewer the errors induced by using digital machines will be. In the case at hand the instantaneous Ii and Vi values are calculated exactly and once we have them it's a matter of simple multiplication of Ii*Vi and averaging the obtained products over all members that will bring about the needed value of Pin (same for Ii*Ii*R regarding Pout). Note, Ii*Vi is the instantaneous slope of the energy-time curve and the average slope (averaged over all instantaneous slopes) provides Pin at once. No additional arithmetic involving small numbers -- the fiend of digital machines.

You can see from the spreadsheets I'm attaching that, at negative voltage offset there is not only OU but all the power is returned to the source -- super OU, as it were. On the other hand, positive offsets yield severe underunity. The zero offset gives what's expected -- unity. It may only be guessed why such an important effect has been missed so far -- wrong procedures, voltage offset is never considered and, most likely, pure suppression. It very well may be that someone has seen it but has dismissed it following the brainwashing that OU cannot be in science. People are afraid to lose their jobs and positions at universities for lesser controversies let alone claiming violation of CoE. Recall also what I told you in the Summer -- then I found with astonishment that in most prestigious universities here on the East Coast EE departments don't even consider measuring currents in the student labs let lone in research. Anyway, a lot can be said about this but for now we should focus, I think, on the issue and, of course, ruminate on the strategies to make it known by the mainstream and how to make it become mainstream.

[Omnibus]

@All,

I know you'll f$&@ing love this. I posted the above results in a forum dedicated to discussing problems of electrical engineering: http://eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=238 . Not only was I banned immediately from the forum but the thread and any trace of what I posted was deleted mercilessly.

Before the ban someone, I guess the moderator, posted a reply to the effect that I must have made an error and it's for me and for nobody else to find the error. I replied that I have not made an error in my analysais and if he thinks otherwise he should, kndly, show where the error is. The response was a total ban and deletion of the whole thread.

I thought you might wanna know of this development.

[Omnibus]

Now, while I'm banned and the thread is deleted, I got this link in my e- mail :  http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=293851 . My reply that I have made no errors in my analysis and if he thinks otherwise he should show where that error is, is missing from the exchange.

[Omnibus]

Watch this. There's a new development -- I'm still banned but the thread is back with a couple new comments.: http://eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=293851&page=1 .

[Omnibus]

Saga continues. Aside from the ban which persists (I wrote an e-mail to the administrator, as is required by that forum; no response so far) the thread is again deleted. While it was alive someone warned me that I underestimate the power of the adversaries and I may not only be banned but my internet access may be curtailed. And all that for posting some little inauspicious set of data ... Pathetic ... Must be very important to ban posting that particular set of data. Thank god we have forums such as this one and a couple of others. It has been infested by trolls and zealous activists lately which made most good participants leave but nevertheless, it's good that we at least have that. Of course, it's not the point to preach to the converted so I'll have to see what further steps I may undertake. The problem is, especially here in the US, any attempt to approach colleagues with this is perceived as a provocation and a personal attack. People are profoundly afraid to lose their jobs. It's really cold outside. Banning in virtual world for something that may seem innocuous tells you in no uncertain terms what will happen to you in the real world where the pain could be really tangible.