Joule Ringer!

[flathunter]

11volts..
3300uf cap..
flyback coil..
no bifilar..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATMDcRL3vF0

robbie

Great vid kooler!

5V (1AA in charger)
58000 micF cap
exciter charging flyback coil j.ringer
no bifilar
neon used in place of large Mohm resistor.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewG-5MQI6K4

[kooler]

seth
i been working on a bunch on pc's lately so i haven't been able to get back here for 2 days..
so i was using a 300v 500ma transistor..
and my bwjt circuit on that small flyback..
i have a few other ideas to try soon..

[Doug1]

Gary
Ive seen pictures of the candy cane.
Your discribing the back wards wave tube. You can find data on the perticulars of that design floating around.It's used for satalite comunications it can carry serveral data streams in the form of different freq's at the same time. The fields in the coil around the conductor actually slow down the what is in the conductor but in doing so some energy in the form of magnetic feild strength is imparted to the coil from stream in the conductor.It would have to go through a second unit to increase the wave diameter using a reversal of the dirst unit. One or the other I suspect would have to be of a different length and width to get the desired results.
  I find it kind of strange how they are able to impart some of the strength of the magnetic feild into the energy stream of a week signal with a magnet to increase it at all. Im still working on a mental model in 3D. Try to take notice their use of winding directions. Im still leaning towards it needing to be incased in a copper tube with a earth ground and a antanna. Maybe a tube with speaker magnets at the ends.I like it ,its compact uses very little material.Best of all they did all the explaining and it is in use.No room for arguments.

[resonanceman]

It would have to go through a second unit to increase the wave diameter using a reversal of the dirst unit. One or the other I suspect would have to be of a different length and width to get the desired results.

Doug

I am not so sure a second unit would be needed

It looks to me like they are just pushing a signal throuugh a magnetic field that is just strong enough to slow the signal down.

With their technology  they have to have a stage to make the electron beam and another stage to transform the electron  beam back into normal electricity.

With my version all that is needed is the candy cane coil a tube with magnets around it and something to make the pulses.

The ferrite in the toroids should  be very effective in capturing any magnetic energy entrained by the pulses.

If I have time I might play with the idea a little tomorrow.
I am not sure about the tube size.........but I am sure that because of the toroids we would  need alot less magnetic field than they use for the electron beam version.

I am thinking of keeping it simple........ set up a JT..... use a LED array or CFL as a load......(after the candy cane) ...........then slide the candy cane into the tube........if it goes out.....the magnets are to strong ......if the light stays the same ......either the magnets are to weak.........or I am wrong about the whole thing.


If the light gets brighter....... YOU have to come up with a name for the circuit



gary

[Doug1]

Well you must see it different then me then. I would have made it like the gaphic first.
Maybe with a pencil a spring and a small donut type magnet using the pencil for the coil form since it already has a conductor in it just find one thin enough or sand one down. The outer spring has to have the right pitch enough to produce little bitty ringlets of fields that reach the inside conductor so it can interact with the conductor in the center of the pencil.
Gary you might also want to tuck this file away someplace for when you need it.To build your own test rig for your own uses.
HB, MS 01-21-2011 google will return the correct response.
Also i didnt see your question before<Do  you know how  powerful the magnets along the tube are?> week ,not greater then the magnetic feild caused in the reverse action from central conductor to coil around it except when looking for the opposite effect to increase the magnetic component of the coil by robbing inertia from the beam.
I dont do names I have people who do that for me.