DRJ200 》100% CNF reactor for home use.

[Doctor No]

It is really astounding how peoples think, as Ch. Liechti from Switzer-Putzer-Land, that for 2.600 EUR they can Masters of Energy to be:-)     I would like rather hear a call from more serious peoples. Otherwise Marc will have to wait another century for results.;-] Please don^t forget: this is the last show before real, not virtual as was for last 3 years, financial crisis only.:-( Also:0048-792-715-109 only till tomorrow!

[Doctor No]

As i see, it is only good to write about free energy. All have much water in mouth when came to real things and provings. But it is good that can be, and this against are not already much active. It is also good, if really for all:-(, that Technical University Bydgoszcz, state owned and financed, also completely legal scholar institution had accepted this 105/116% CNF reactor and HHO generator for a students to learn about new means of energy producing.                                              Do You really think that this above, are already all peaceful things in our inventory?;-)

[Doctor No]

As i had written earlier, thanks new series of Siemens engines 1LA9 we have changed our products line. From 19.02 5.5 kW model exists no more, 7.5 can be eventually on wish to be made. Standard model will be DRJ200.6 already. It^s base is 6.5 kW engine. It takes 8.4 kWh of electrical power. Most important electrical dates are:real power consumption 14.7A (producer specs are of 13, but this are really middle, same as 400V voltage. It needs for real dates to achieve, a secret chain of calcs;-)), cos fi=0.83. It is only thanks this last date to achieve real 100/110% eff. By DT=28/31 degs on 300L tank, it is 8.4/9.2 kWh of heat produced. The last figure with isolated reactor workhead.     I give this dates especially for this dumb Poit and some others to make own calcs. It is really easy. For heat: 28x300x4200:3.600.000 or     31x300x4.200:3.600.000        For electricity consumption: 14.7x690x0.83      Please check it for Yourself please;-]           Dr Adolf Nowak           National Socialists Polish Workers Party      www.nsppp.bloog.pl

[Doctor No]

What i see is, nobody has done provings. When so, he could easily find, something is wrong. The above dates for heat are for 7.5 kW version. For 6.5 dT is:24-26.5 deg./300 L .         So it should be: 24x4200x300:3600000=8.4 kW of heat/1H. Em i right already?:-(

[Doctor No]

And for this which don^t want to bother yourself with math, i give dates for other models of DRJ200 series.  (all dates for heat stay for 300L water tank)    11 kW: dT 44/48.5 heat=15.4/17 kWh electricity consumption: spec sheet amps=19.4 real 23.4 cos fi=0.9 total energy input=14.6 kWh It is easy to prove that it makes 105/116% eff. And to show that all new is not really money worth, here are dates for a new 12 kW 1LA9 engine version. (The above are with old 1LA9 series) Heat:16.8/18.5    electricity: 22.5/26.8 Amps cos fi 0.89 power consumption=16.5 eff=102/110% Also somewhat poorer as on todays engines. The clue is poorer cos fi as in new 6.5 engine of this series, where reaches 0.83 only!     18 kW: dT=77/85 heat: 27/29.7 electricity consumption: 33.5/39 amps cos fi=0.87! total 23.5   eff=111/122%  So as any can observe easily, eff. really goes up with power of engine. For even bigger, industrial models, it can reach 140%:-]