Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Break through!

Started by Butch LaFonte, January 25, 2011, 01:10:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Magluvin

Quote from: Low-Q on February 06, 2011, 06:15:08 AM
Butch,

Just an idea: What if you use permanent springs to force the discs together. The magnetic field in phase 2 will go through the solid bar, so the springs are now able to press the discs together. In phase 1 the discs are closest to the magnets and will be forced apart due to the like pole all the discs are facing. In this phase there is less steel to guide the magnetic flux, so the magnets want to use the solid parts of the rotor. So then the rotor rotates to ligne up the solid steel. Now, the discs are out of the magnetic field and the springs will overcome the magnetic force and compress the discs together again to make a "solid" steel. This will in turn let the rotor continue into phase 1 again, and the cycle repeats.

The delay in the mass of the discs will be sufficient to make an offset which will make sure of a stable and continous rotation.

Just some thoughts.

Vidar

Hey Vidar

Are you saying that the disks or plates will repel each other while in close proximity to the stator magnet pole?   Have you tried this?

Mags

Magluvin

Sorry, my last post may have seemed rude.  But if lets say we had iron filings instead of disks, would they separate when subject to the pole of a magnet? 
Id love to hear more if what you guys are talking about works.  Maybe I missed something

Mags

Low-Q

Quote from: Magluvin on February 08, 2011, 09:30:41 PM
Sorry, my last post may have seemed rude.  But if lets say we had iron filings instead of disks, would they separate when subject to the pole of a magnet? 
Id love to hear more if what you guys are talking about works.  Maybe I missed something

Mags
It's OK :) No problem!

When you have a couple of iron discs stacked together, they want to separate in presence of a magnetic pole. This happens because all the discs are now small magnets with equal poles side by side. We know that equal poles repel eachother.

If the spring are not too hard on the discs, the magnetic field will try, end succeed in separating the discs to a sertain extent.

I have tried to stack a bunch of washers on a nonmagnetic rod. The washers will separate in presence of a magnetic pole.

Experiments also show that when the discs are separated, the attraction to the magnetic pole are greater. Hopefully, this will be compensated by outer discs which will in sum reduce the magnetic conductivity when the discs are separated so there will be greater attraction to the solid part of the rotor so it wants to rotate. When all the magnetic flux pass through the solid part, there will be less flux through the washers which in turn will be too little for the discs to be kept separated, so the spring will smash those discs together, making a solid iron part. At this phase, the rotor will freely continue to rotate because of the uniform rotor. A delay caused by the mass in the discs will allow the discs to separate "too late", so the rotor can rotate more than 90 degrees before they are fully separated. This delay also applies further, but that is a good thing as we want as much separation as possible for as long as possible to let the solid part of the rotor to enter a second round - then hopefully the rotor will continue.

However, I have a feeling that I have not taken into acount all important details about the real life physics, which will force the design to a stop anyways. I do hope for the best :)

Vidar

Butch LaFonte

Something everyone should keep in mind is that when the disks are touching the upper and lower bars or rather in slidding contact and are positioned directly under the magnet poles, there is no repulsion between them. The reason for this is that there is no air gap. The air gap is where all the repulsion takes place.
Butch

Butch LaFonte

Quote from: Low-Q on February 08, 2011, 03:37:26 AM
When separated the outer parts have its greatest mass aligned with the magnetic field, and will not turn away, but will be kept locked in the magnetic field. I think your first example with the discs are better. If it works better i practice, I don't know.

Vidar
We found that the "locking force" on the outside elements is far less than the locking force on the center rotor.
So that is a net gain in energy. Will post video of tests tomorrow night.
Butch