Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Is there proof gravity can not be a energy source?

Started by brian334, February 07, 2011, 01:25:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

brian334

Mr. Rat,
I generally agree with ever thing you post, but to prove gravity is not a energy source a few limited examples will not due.
My definition of energy is the ability to do work, or the ability to make things move.
Gravity clearly can make things move.

ResinRat2

So, Omnibus, I am trying to clarify what you mean by just the object.

If I were to take an automobile out of gas, and four strong men push it up a pretty steep hill for say a quarter of a mile to its top. Then these guys push it over the top of the hill and let it roll back down the other side (without stopping it at any time of course) then this is a violation of CoE in your definition?
Research is the only place in a company where you can continually have failures and still keep your job.

I knew immediately that was where I belonged.

Omnibus

Quote from: ResinRat2 on February 11, 2011, 03:52:52 PM
So, Omnibus, I am trying to clearify what you mean by just the object.

If I were to take an automobile out of gas, and four strong men push it up a pretty steep hill for say a quarter of a mile to its top. Then these guys push it over the top of the hill and let it roll back down the other side (without stopping it at any time of course) then this is a violation of CoE in your definition?

Correct, it is a violation of CoE. At the top, because it can't be gotten there without moving it, that is, because of imparting velocity to it, the car will have both potential and kinetic energy. Now, once at rest at the top and then let go down the hill it will give back only the potential energy when reaches the foot of the hill. The kinetic energy will be lost. The energy balance along the closed loop ground-top-ground will be non-zero which is a violation of CoE.

brian334

I hate to get in the middle of a cat fight but will both Mr. Rat and omnibus stick to the topic.

ResinRat2

OK Omnibus, now please bear with me I have one more question.

If this same car was not out of gas, and drove to the top of the same hill, then at the top it turned off its engine and coasted down, would that be a violation of CoE by your definition. (without stopping at any time during this example).

Again, I am just trying to clarify what you mean.

Thanks

RR2
Research is the only place in a company where you can continually have failures and still keep your job.

I knew immediately that was where I belonged.