Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



1 kW zero point energy @ Peswiki.com

Started by Low-Q, February 10, 2011, 07:48:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

neptune

As so often happens ,a simple device turns out not to be so simple after all . I read on another forum[ I cant remember where] that someone else reported similar problems with this computer programme in that small changes in parameters cause illogical large changes in results . The prof promised to look at this , but it may be a month before he has time . I feel that it is the software that is at fault , not the underlying theory of the machine . I feel that it would be difficult to reach a successful build without the software . There may be others who can sort this . If not , we have waited thousands of years for this , what is another month?

neptune

@Woopy . As I said , direct help and advice from the prof is unlikely in the immediate future . One factor which will influence how easy success will be is this .Is the magnet speed of 6000 RPM critical , or can the system be tuned at a different frequency . We can answer this question by looking at the computer program . The big question is , is RPM one of the parameters that can be changed in the program? If it is , the task becomes easier . We can adjust RPM to suit whatever is the resonant frequency of the tuned circuit . On reflection I have realised also that having the shaft inside a tube that passes between the windings is unlikely to influence results , because these shaft tubes are not in the part of the winding near the poles , where the action occurs . I feel that it is important to build a self runner before worrying about adding a load . Any info I get from the Prof will be passed on immediately .

woopy

Quote from: neptune on February 17, 2011, 01:03:04 PM
@Woopy . As I said , direct help and advice from the prof is unlikely in the immediate future . One factor which will influence how easy success will be is this .Is the magnet speed of 6000 RPM critical , or can the system be tuned at a different frequency . We can answer this question by looking at the computer program . The big question is , is RPM one of the parameters that can be changed in the program? If it is , the task becomes easier . We can adjust RPM to suit whatever is the resonant frequency of the tuned circuit . On reflection I have realised also that having the shaft inside a tube that passes between the windings is unlikely to influence results , because these shaft tubes are not in the part of the winding near the poles , where the action occurs . I feel that it is important to build a self runner before worrying about adding a load . Any info I get from the Prof will be passed on immediately .

Hi Neptune

yes you can modify the RPM  of the magnet "at will " in the program.
So i did for my coil simulation to get 77 watt output. I spin the magnet at 3000 rpm and it goes (see pix in red )

But i can not go further so long i don't know if the magnet is diametricaly magnetised or not.  So i hope that Prof Turtur will answer on this point.

and good luck at all

Laurent

haithar

Quote from: DreamThinkBuild on February 16, 2011, 07:24:28 PM
Hi All,

I've converted Prof TurTur code from Pascal over to Octave. I'm having one issue with the code. I've run through it dozen's of times but I'm not getting the same values back on the simulation part with the same values that the professor used. I do remember when I programmed in Delphi/Pascal for database applications I had issues with formulas having to be re-arranged when converting to C/C++. That may be it but I would like a new set of eyes to look through the code maybe I missed something obvious.

This is a straight copy of his code. I see a lot of places that could use optimization and structure but refrained just to get the original values working first. With a better structure for the sim we should be able to plot a 3D graph of say x=magnet size vs y=coil size z=watt output instead of manually running the sim for each value change.

Software I'm using for those who want to play with the code:

Open Source Octave (Matlab like clone)
http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/

GUI Octave for IDE front end under windows
https://sites.google.com/site/guioctave/
Hi,
i created a c++ version of his algorithm and mailed Prof. Turtur with some questions i had.
It also has a matlab exporter, if the syntax is the same for Octave it would probably help you. Write me a PM if you want the source code.

here is a picture, the german headlines are english in the current version.

tomd000