1 kW zero point energy @ Peswiki.com

[neptune]

@ Woopy .Thanks for the info re RPM .That , to me is very reassuring . However we have to realise that lower RPM = lower frequency =Larger values of L and C . In my mind there can be no doubt that the magnet is diametrically magnetised , because this is shown in two separate diagrams by Prof Turtur . Why would you therefore be in any doubt ? Is the magnet shown in your photograph diametrically magnetised ?I have already emailed the prof with this question and as soon as he replies I will post his answer .
          These days I can not do much in the way of a build due to health issues . I keep getting a few ideas though ,and sooner or later I might say something which will help someone .A cheap way round the magnet problem would be to embed two cubic neo magnets in a wheel cast from epoxy resin . Possible issues would be , magnets would try to escape at very high RPM . Further into development it might be possible to have multiple magnets/poles ,leading to higher frequencies at lower RPM .   I believe higher frequencies = greater output . 

[neptune]

For anyone contemplating a build ,as we have discussed earlier , there is the problem of the coil and the shaft needing to occupy the same space . Earlier I showed how to overcome this using a short shaft . However for those who wish to use a longer shaft running through the coil here is a suggestion . Google  Bedini-Cole window motor ". I You should easily find pictures and diagrams that show the shaft arrangement , which can be adapted for the current device .

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi All,

I've modified the Octave code with help from Haithar although I'm still getting strange readings. This formula is very touchy because it calculates off itself each proceeding value in a 10000row*6column matrix. One small value change creates a cascading amplified effect of any error. I've attached the latest code for those who want to try it. If you see any errors or fixes let me know.

@Neptune,

Sorry to hear of your health. Your input is greatly appreciated you never know what phrase will spark a great idea. You are right in the simulation increasing the 100rpm speed to 200 greatly increases the output.

@Laurent,

I'm pretty sure the magnet is diametric. If you place a diametric magnet on a strip of metal it should have resistance when you try to roll it from one pole to another. If it's not diametric N/S on the top/bottom it should roll with little resistance on the same strip.

[neptune]

@DreamThinkBuild .Thanks for the kind words .My big problem is I have gone blind in one eye ,and the other one has a cateract . But they say that in the land of the blind , the one eyed man is king,so no worries .
          I took another look at a bike dynamo today . It is years since I stripped one down . The magnet used to be a steel cylinder , but later ones are a ferrite type material , and possibly by now , neodymium . At the top of the device is a "neck" about 2inches long and a half inch in diameter .This contains the shaft and bearings . If you removed everything except the magnet , shaft and bearings you would have the basis of a small device , but the outside diameter of the coil would be limited to about 4 inches .
, or it would cover the pulley . I cant help thinking you could use thedynamo [alternator ]  just as it is and connect a suitable cap across it . These dynamos are very inexpensive[$10 ?] to buy .The big problem is to determine the resonant frequency of the resultant parallel tuned circuit .Does anyone have a circuit for a simple LC oscillator circuit without a coil tap that will work at about 100Hz?

[haithar]

I wrote you a personal message neptune, you can test my C++ version with easy user interface for Turturs algorithm, it's not yet ready for public but you can use it without any problems.