Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Shorting coil gives back more power

Started by romerouk, February 18, 2011, 09:51:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

woopy

Hi Gyula

I tried your correction on the circuit ( that i got from  the diagram of Doug Konzen) and it works , but i got this very pure sine wave without any spike but with peak to peak 80 and more voltage.

than i tried to modify the hall sensor position to get the spike and nothing happen. Than i simply disconnected the 2 Halls and the scope trace stayed the same.

Than i tried different AC caps and the result is each time very different.

So i have have to go sleeping and perhaps tomorrow will bring some better idea of this really complex thing.

By the way i use now the IRF 540 mosfet  and i intend to order some IRF 2807 with very low on resistance  any advice ?

good luck at all :)

laurent

gyulasun

Hi Laurent,

I also must finish for today but what I quickly can tell you is that first try to use a reed switch just to control the two MOSFETs, ok? I attached the schematic I also showed to Doug Konzen last August. (it is in EVGRAY Photo folder http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EVGRAY/photos/album/1586264660/pic/list ).
When you have this reed control going ok then you may wish to use a single Hall switch first, on one of the sine wave peaks, then with a second Hall on the other peak.

Good night,  Gyula

EDIT you may even leave out the series capacitor too and insert it later when you see useful.

FreeEnergyInfo

Quote from: gyulasun on February 27, 2011, 06:06:21 PM
Hi Laurent,

I also must finish for today but what I quickly can tell you is that first try to use a reed switch just to control the two MOSFETs, ok? I attached the schematic I also showed to Doug Konzen last August. (it is in EVGRAY Photo folder http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EVGRAY/photos/album/1586264660/pic/list ).
When you have this reed control going ok then you may wish to use a single Hall switch first, on one of the sine wave peaks, then with a second Hall on the other peak.

Good night,  Gyula

EDIT you may even leave out the series capacitor too and insert it later when you see useful.

this circuit ist corect or nocorect ?????????

gyulasun

Hi FreeEnergyInfo ,

I believe it correct, I also say first use it without the series capacitor (I mean the 0.47uF) and when you see the spikes at the wave peaks then try the right cap value,  Konzen can give you more info on this latter.

Gyula

FreeEnergyInfo

Quote from: gyulasun on February 27, 2011, 06:20:06 PM
Hi FreeEnergyInfo ,

I believe it correct, I also say first use it without the series capacitor (I mean the 0.47uF) and when you see the spikes at the wave peaks then try the right cap value,  Konzen can give you more info on this latter.

Gyula

THANKS.......