Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  Well sorry Rose I deregistered from there yesterday when the Poynted one PM'd me over there to threaten me about a post I made over here, now it seems I too am banned, Not to worry  everyone knows how it goes at our. They just seem to like to here each other drone on and on about denying any claim of OU regardless of there merits. I know I won't miss that forum.
  As allways good luck Rose Pete

Pete?  Sorry to hear you're also being victimised.  There's no QUESTION that pressure is put to everyone to conform to the 'poynted viewpoynt'.  The overarching reach of the overbearing tyrant.  It will brook no argument.  But my endless concern is just that he doesn't effectively derail things here. 

There's good news in the offing Pete.  I'll PM you later.

Take great care of yourself,
Kindest as ever,
Rosie

[WilbyInebriated]

Then would you agree Stefan that it is imperative to obtain an accurate measurement of INPUT power from the battery?

Here is a method that appears to work well, without the need for an oscilloscope:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10564.msg280282#msg280282

.99

any more news on this? sorry for posting here, but you had stephan lock that thread after telling us you were going to work on it that weekend. last post was almost a month ago...

[poynt99]

  Well sorry Rose I deregistered from there yesterday when the Poynted one PM'd me over there to threaten me about a post I made over here, now it seems I too am banned, Not to worry  everyone knows how it goes at our. They just seem to like to here each other drone on and on about denying any claim of OU regardless of thier merits. I know I won't miss that forum.
  As allways good luck Rose Pete

Actually Pete, the truth is you left on your own after I questioned you on your comment. I don't believe I threatened you in any way. As you left on your own accord, I deleted your account.

Public viewing at OUR is back up, except of course for those that have had their IP's banned for one reason or another.

.99

[poynt99]

any more news on this? sorry for posting here, but you had stephan lock that thread after telling us you were going to work on it that weekend. last post was almost a month ago...

Good question.

I have been working very hard to get a commitment as to the working circuit connections so that I (and others) may replicate and test. This circuit will be the one used to test the proposed INPUT power measurement, as well as showing a few other pertinent measurements relative to the claims. As per my recent posts, I'll be building the circuit as per the video demonstration.

The purpose for using this circuit, is that it operates at over 1MHz frequency, which is one of the questionable issues of the proposed method. One other very good reason, is that it represents a circuit that presently has claims of COP>1 associated with it.

.99

[vonwolf]

Actually Pete, the truth is you left on your own after I questioned you on your comment. I don't believe I threatened you in any way. As you left on your own accord, I deleted your account.

Public viewing at OUR is back up, except of course for those that have had their IP's banned for one reason or another.

.99

  I deleted my account you then banned me, no reason to ban my ip I was respectful but ban you did, I even wished you good luck. Your right no threat just your usual bullying that you so often try to do, only problem was your forum holds no interest to me anymore.
   Pete