Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

This particular device is designed to produce heat.  It does so with apparently little or no disturbance to the source dipole.  One way to recover energy to make a "self run" would be via peltier junction, but lets think in a little more practical terms.  A small photovoltaic panel would amply cover providing current to the batteries to replace any that may be lost covering the cost of switching in the circuit.  That is simply adding another input to our already open system, and adding that input at the source dipole, a point in the circuit that is critical to maintaining the resonance.  I'm sure we could charge up a cap or even a tuned LC in the circuit itself somewhere as well without critically altering the heating effect, and switch it with an SCR so it dumps that collected potential back across the battery as well, if need be.

If we are seeing energy radiate through the circuit in all directions that there is a path to a point of lower potential, even back into the source dipole, then it appears we have the desired effect already though.  Artificial stimulation of the environment to produce a resonant condition which creates harvestable electrostatic potentials.  Lightning in a bottle:)  If, at very worst, we have an incredibly efficient heater that draws very little current from a photovoltaic panel/battery array, then we have still done something important.

Cheers,
Twinbeard

Nice thinking Twinbeard.   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

This is all very good research and you are very determined, the problem is if you have free energy
then why can't you or anybody else produce a self-runner (yes that did come out as words)
as we are now on your third thread and yet again having measurement disagreement 
I feel that a self-runner it is the only answer left
I have seen many try to reproduced your work,some of them I know well and I trust them, yet they have also failed, I would love to make one of your circuits, if only I could believe in it.
Best of luck with the research I hope you win in the end you deserve it



http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=videos&search_query=Rosemary+Ainslie+circuit&search_sort=video_date_uploaded&suggested_categories=28&uni=3

Good point Cat.  I can't answer you here.  Actually I can.  But it would take me forever.  I expect something jolly close to a closed system though.  And - frankly - I think we've got exactly that.  But - as ever - time will tell.  I'm tired of trying to convince anyone at all.  I'll be happy when we get a few anomalies endorsed by our learned and revered as that may be a start towards something a little more positive.  At least we can show that continual negative number - on low and high outputs.  They'll have to digest that.   And hopefully they'll come with their flash drives - so they can do their own sums.  I'm also looking forward to their factoring in for that inductance when they do those integrations.  It only adds to our argument.

Where I really feel I earn the prize is that I'm doing any experiments at all.  It bores me to tears.

Kindest regards,
Rosie 

[powercat]

There are still more questions than answers  as usual when all is said and done, more is said than done. all I am saying is a self-runner is a very good way of proving your theory, if you have excess energy use it to make a self runner
oh how the world needs free energy now and I fully support any one trying to achieve this

[powercat]

Sorry I must have been posting when you were,so I missed your last reply,
any advances that you make in the direction of efficiency is a great step forward,
I am like most people here dreaming of free energy,
enough from me tonight.
determination will get you there in the end

[Sprocket]

Hello Sprocket.  Golly.  That's a lot of batteries.  I'd be most interested to see if they'd work.  Can't see why not.  Why so many?  I don't own a hundred of anything.  Never been brave enough to buy in bulk.  My argument is that I'm not sure I'll live long enough to make use of it.  Well.  I have a Greek friend who tells me that they consider there's only 1 sin.  That's buying retail.  LOL.  So.  I've clearly got a lot to learn.

But I can't make predictions here - unfortunately.  You'll just have to find out. But that's certainly at least a potential 360 volts to apply.  It should be interesting.  And at that value you should also be able see how well they last.  Pity they're not rechargeable.  I'm not sure if that would be required to take advantage of that energy return.  I see Lawrence's device forever being compromised because of this lack.  That's the real advantage of those lead acid numbers.

Anyway.  Good luck.  Nice to see the questions being asked.  Wish I could answer them.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

I got them for nothing from a store that was closing down, and they're all brand-new!  They're also all rechargeable, (NiMH) so no problem there either.  Yes, I've got 300+ volts but I'm sure their combined resistance would prove a problem, especially where high current draw is involved - like here I expect!  But you're right, it needs to be tested...