Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

Thank you for your patience and perseverance. It is sad that these agenda agents have despoiled yet another chance of an informative list.

It is well within reason that anyone trying your circuit without success would normally write and tell you of their failure and seek further guidance.
But the outcome if left without such input would be for the average person to pack his bags and move on.

The very tenaciousness of these pitbulls, following you from list to list and filling them with bile is proof of their mission.

Near the beginning of this list you had some intriguing theories on alternate energy flows that I would love to have heard more on... oh well, maybe someday?

Harti has hundreds of lists to skim and is not always aware of when and how a list is being destroyed. A well run list would have a full time moderator who could take the appropriate steps to correct certain imbalances.

Just to say thanks Rosemary, we love you and hope there is a decent venue somewhere where "we", real builders and experimenters can access your discovery and wonderful ideas without harassment.

Kind regards

Ron P

Thank you Ron.  It's always a relief to be reminded that my work is actually appreciated.

For those of you who are following this subject - here's a link to my blog.  And for those who are looking into the experimental side of things then my email is
ainslie@mweb.co.za 

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[happyfunball]

Are you implying that there is a practical and useful relationship between battery voltage and battery state-of-charge?

.99

I mean battery charge obviously. She tested it, right? It didn't go down, right? Excess heat generated, right? No? Yes? Maybe?

[poynt99]

I mean battery charge obviously. She tested it, right? It didn't go down, right? Excess heat generated, right? No? Yes? Maybe?

If you mean battery state-of-charge (SOC), no, she hasn't done that test. She refuses to do this, and she refuses to perform a continuous operation test over an extended period of time, all the while taking periodic SOC measurements.

She may have measured the battery voltage with the DMM a few times, but as we all know, battery voltage is an extremely poor and unreliable method for determining the battery's SOC.

Batteries are designed in fact to hover close to their theoretical terminal voltage for as long as possible under load, until finally near the end of their capacity, the battery voltage falls off rapidly, but by that time you already have an over-depleted battery on your hands.

.99

[Sprocket]

Well at least ponty your still there,
many of us were put under moderation...all I asked was for an acceptable test to see if the batteries were really holding up or not.
After years of contributing to this site I can see no point if people who dare to seek the truth are banished or thrown on the fire.
Real scientific process and logic will always win out. If you dont then your left with a cult like belief system.
Karm

It's very hard to have any faith whatsoever in the' scientific establishment' when prestigious institutions like MIT have been shown to have falsified their cold-fusion data 20 years ago.  In a way I understand why they would do so - the notion that almost all of these institutions are "scientists on welfare"  is the reality, bite the hand that feeds you and you're out of a job!   Intellectual prostitutes, pure and simple.  And wasn't it the same group of scientists that demanded the resignation of one of their own colleagues when he had the gal to suggest that this LENR excess energy might be the result of a transmutation of elements?  If there's ever an end to this tyranny that place should be razed to the ground, Couple that with the fact that about 80% of meaningful scientific advances are by individuals with no formal scientific education and it's even more reason to be wary of the "real scientific process".

[hoptoad]

So Rose, please post a new circuit diagram, where we can see, how your MOSFETs were really wired.
snip....

An entirely reasonable request that I'll echo .......  please post a new circuit diagram. 

Rather than just reading or even watching videos about your circuit and what's going on, oscillation wise, I 'd like a chance to replicate it and observe the effect in operation myself.

As an experimenter, I prefer and enjoy the hands on approach to projects I wish to get involved with.

A simple schematic circuit with parts specifications/description would be great.

For greater replication accuracy, specs on the function generator signal would also be very welcome: e.g peak to peak voltage, dc voltage bias offset (if any), frequency range and signal type e.g. sine, square, sawtooth.

echo again ......... pretty please, post a new circuit diagram.   

Cheers