Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

At a point not too long ago, the attached was the circuit connections diagram for that video demonstration.

Clearly the diagram you are now presenting, is substantially different from the original in the video.

Could you please, for the benefit of the readership here, explain how the CSR has been relocated to an entirely different position? Also, PLEASE provide a complete schematic of the apparatus in the video demonstration, if the attached is not already one that is correct.

This is all not making much sense Rose, and I think you're losing not only readership here because of this, but losing everyone in general (including me), in terms of their understanding of what exactly you are trying to discuss here.

.99

Guys - this is STRANGE.  I posted the following - post 964 - for those who would care to go back and check.  In it, among other things I stated the following

"Poynty - It does not make a blind bit of difference to the waveform or the results whether the ground from the signal generator is directly on the shared negative rail or if it's in series with the shunt.  The fact that it was set up that way at the demo was happenstance.  The fact is that it's more conventient to keep the ground in the shared rail becaause we were running two osciloscopes and 4 channels - concurrently.  That made the the junction at D rather crowded.  In point of fact it is normally at the pin marked at D on the video.  But that's because I usually only ever use the LeCroy.  I've just checked the video and the board.  Rght now and for those shots I took to argue your 'undersampling' quibble - it is and usually is positioned at D - in series with the shunt.  I wonder what difference it would make to your waveforms if you placed it at the negative rail.  I'd be interested to see.   I suspect very little.  But in any event it's wrong. It is properly in series with the CSR."

I am absolutely not able to explain that.  I need to reboot here.  But there is no question that someone disabled that post in order to prevent me from referencing it.  I see that there are two posts of mine missing.  I'll see if this even shows up when I post it and will then get back here.

It appears that this post is definitely on public view.  A friend of mine emailed it to me so that I could copy it over here.  I'm not sure that this is clear.  What has happened here is to two of my posts have been taken out of my own view and there are precisely 2 less posts in this thread than are available on on the public forum.  Can anyone advise me?  According to my own access here are only 974 posts.  And available to the public are 976 (this one excepted). 

Moving on.  Poynty - I am entirely satisfied that you do not represent the 'readers' and you certainly do not represent the readers' interests.  From where I sit you have only EVER become actively engaged when you've set out to disprove a claim.  I won't go into the 'thinness' of your arguments used against me - and I certainly won't comment on where you've worked elsewhere - but there's one thing I'm curious about.  How did you get that oscillation if you indeed did a copy of our circuit.  Just that.  How did you manage that early oscillation 'first off' as you put it?

Rosemary

[poynt99]

According to what I see, that post was reply#961 Rose.

Someone else also mentioned that there seems to be a discrepancy in the reply number that is visible. It seems there is an offset of 3 replies.

The only explanation I have is that Stefan may have gone back and deleted a few posts in this thread today.



.99

[poynt99]

When I am logged in, the number of replies says 975. When I am logged out, the number of replies says 978. That would explain it.

.99

[poynt99]

Rose, could you please provide a response to this post? The readers here deserve to know the answers.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg283609#msg283609

Thank you.

.99

[Groundloop]

Rosemary,

Is the attached drawing showing your most resent switch?

Regards,
Groundloop.