Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

So Guys,  it seems that this thread is also about to be derailed.  I am not sure that it will matter much what I write.  And it seems that Harti has given Poynt license to do his worst.  I've often wondered exactly how committed this forum is to genuine advancement of this new age science.  Here we have something of a conundrum. We have a forum that calls itself overunity.com - where the readers are interested in clean green and a group of self elected spokespersons are actively encouraged to derail each and every claim. 

The truly extraordinary aspect of this is that the most outspoken of these spokespersons has not only simulated the results that 'defy belief' - that exceed that allowable limit in the transfer of electric energy - but has also openly acknowledged that result.  Yet, far from being intrigued or even - in advancing this knowledge for everyone's benefit - he is now actively engaged in flaming these threads that he can 'get me out the picture'.

If you will recall - excactly the same thing happened before.  We had a full on replication - and no sooner was it ready to go to 'print' so to speak - no sooner had we marshalled the argument and the evidence - than two key players joined forces and actively tried to separate me from the invention.  Those players were Fuzzy and Harvey.  They locked the threads here - then locked me out of EF.com - and then started their own thread where I was not allowed to comment.  Their pretext was that I was generally too 'thick' to have managed the evidence in the first instance.  That I was imposing a spurious thesis on their independent discovery - and that there was a real physical risk to generating those frequencies and that it could be construed a danger.  They also implied that I had hidden patent interests and that my representations were not to be believed - in any context at all.  And surprise - surprise - far from promoting the technology - they then set about removing the most of that data from easy public access.

And nor have their efforts waned.  Take a look at the threads in Poynty's forum.  Fuzzy screams abuse as loudly as ever and they have even made public a private video that they pestered me to give them to let them see what I look like.  They had three threads running concurrently criticising either me or the claim - under various themes.  Utterly unscrupulous and utterly immoral. Harvey or his wife Laurel only use this forum to access any posters who are supportive of me - to advise them not to be.  And the real joke is this. Poynty complains that I don't respect him.  Somehow he feels that he can advance whatever disrespect he chooses at a wanton disregard of his moderation requirements - and not have that disrespect returned? 

It leaves me wondering if they're rather overly anxious to put a stopper on all this good news.  LOL.  Soon their efforts will be seen to be ridiculous. Not sure what they'll do then.   I'm ENTIRELY satisfied that this will still reach those academic forums.  And then I'll be able to relax.  Right now it's uphill.  But not for much longer.

I'll post later on what I see is actually going on in that circuit.  Right now I'm still licking my wounds after that last slew of posts that Poynty et al have managed.  He's got a team of at least 5 contributors helping him there.  And the worst of it is that they're also crashing into this computer which makes my link here rather tenuous. But it seems they can't yet do lasting damage to my APPLE.  What a brilliant thing.  My other computer has now been entirely dysfunctioned and I'll have to get it 'cured' if that's the term - on Monday. 

Meanwhile - I assure you.  Nothing makes me quite as determined as this on going attack.  I see it as the death rattle of old age physics.  And in with the new.  My job now is to convince you all of this.  I'll do my best.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[poynt99]

So Guys,  it seems that this thread is also about to be derailed.  I am not sure that it will matter much what I write.  And it seems that Harti has given Poynt license to do his worst. 

What Stefan has done by not interfering here, is to allow for a voice whose only concern is to promote the facts, the truth, and provide some important insights from the conventional circuit theory perspective. Surely, these should not be denied.

The truly extraordinary aspect of this is that the most outspoken of these spokespersons has not only simulated the results that 'defy belief' - that exceed that allowable limit in the transfer of electric energy - but has also openly acknowledged that result.

The true fact is this: I have performed a simulation based on your exact circuit that produces the same results (wave forms) as yours when measured precisely the same way, at the same circuit nodes. However, I have at no time stated that current or power IS going back to the battery (the "-192W" post was "tongue-in-cheek" and preceded by a post stating that -9.94W appeared going back to the battery. The "-192W" was obviously meant to be taken in the same context).

And nor have their efforts waned.  Take a look at the threads in Poynty's forum.  Fuzzy screams abuse as loudly as ever and they have even made public a private video that they pestered me to give them to let them see what I look like.

The true fact is that this video is not posted on the OUR forum.

And the real joke is this. Poynty complains that I don't respect him.

I don't recall ever complaining to you about any such thing. Your disrespect for anyone that questions your claims is obvious but irrelevant. What IS relevant and ONLY relevant, is whether your claims have any credible evidence to support them, and thus far there has been none.

Right now I'm still licking my wounds after that last slew of posts that Poynty et al have managed.  He's got a team of at least 5 contributors helping him there.

Do you have any proof to support that bogus claim?  I assure you, I have absolutely no one helping me here.

And the worst of it is that they're also crashing into this computer which makes my link here rather tenuous. But it seems they can't yet do lasting damage to my APPLE.  What a brilliant thing.  My other computer has now been entirely dysfunctioned and I'll have to get it 'cured' if that's the term - on Monday. 

Again, do you have any proof to support that ridiculous and totally bogus claim? Good grief Rose, how far will this nonsense go?

.99

[powercat]

Rosie you're beginning to sound delusional 
your accusations and assumptions are sounding childish not what one would expect from a woman of science.  STOP IT

[vonwolf]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc&feature=player_embedded

Thanks Groundloop
Pete

[poynt99]

Rose, could you please provide a response to this post? The readers here deserve to know the answers.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg283609#msg283609

Thank you.

.99