Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@ Rosemary:

Could you please explain in a short paragraph what exactly you have? (i.e demonstrating). I understand it is some sort of heating device. I've tried reading the posts surrounding this demonstration, but get quickly bamboozled by all the tech talk. I would consider my self a novice inventor and have a keen interest in OU, not a great understanding of electronics (but enough to get by - i.e basics, what the components do and why etc etc).

Poit - it's a good question.  The 'how to' is probably best explained by Neptune et al.  The 'what we have' is - we think - a means of getting an energy efficiency which our measurments show is pretty jolly good.  We have great difficulty in measuring any energy at all 'supplied' by an energy supply source - for a great deal of energy 'dissipated'.  The arguments are that there are errors in measurements.  It's a valid argument.  We need to explore WHERE those errors may be.  But - thus far - we've not found them.  Poynty et al - who probably represent the 'control' in a sort of experimental way - claim that we are wrong because we're not AVERAGING the values.  But - as I've been trying to point out - mainstream will NOT ALLOW AN AVERAGING.  Even if they did - we can get the experiment to show that EVEN WITH AVERAGING we have a gain. 

Hope that makes it clearer.

P.S If this is something that is unpatenable and something that you feel members here have missed, would it be feasible for a step by step guide to build this invention? again sorry for the ignorant questions Thank you

It probably would.  But I am most reluctant to recommend 'replications'.  This because a previous excursion in this direction resulted in a jealous attempt to appropriate that as a discovery.  This is counter productive.  It would deny the thesis that preceded the claim and it would open it to patenting options which we've been at GREAT PAINS AND EXPENSE to avoid.  And more to the point - PRECISE replications are IMPOSSIBLE.  How may ways are there to generate Back electromotive force?  And how many ways can one generate parasitic oscillations?  I'm not sure it could EVER be determined.  What we're trying to encourage people to do is to look at the value in that - and to stop throwing it away.  Because, according to the numbers that we show - there's a surprising evidence of an awful lot of energy that is also very exploitable.

Again.  Hopefully that helps explain things.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary
[/quote]

[Poit]

Thank you

[Magluvin]

Hey Rose

Very cool.    So you've been in the deep end of the pool.  ;]

I always blew off ideas of aether, or energy from the vacuum, dark energy/matter.  But once I got into the Faraday Paradox, a lot of things look different to me.  Just the fact that the magnet could move with the conducting plate and current was still produced, opens doors. 
Imagine a magnet/coil and led arraignment that you could just attach to the spokes of a bicycle wheel and as the wheel spins, led lights.

My beginnings was in 7th grade. Found books in the library on perpetual motion. I made many wheels. My grand father helped. =]
He was an inventor as was his dad.  I think Great grandpa Carl may have known Tesla, as they both had dealings with Westinghouse in Pittsburgh, 60 miles from home.
Carl had a setup in the early 1910s that was what looked like 2 motors connected at the shaft and all wires connected to a box with a switch.  Flip the switch and spin the shaft by hand and off it went.
He had shown it around town, so ha had many witnesses. But the men in black of 1910 came and made threats. He dismantled the device.

So here we are. I think we are on the edge of rediscovering many things that were discouraged many years ago.

This Gabriel transformer is a huge discovery.  It is described in a Tesla pat  433702.  We could have had this back then. Less power in than out.  Thank God for Tesla, and having the paperwork still available to find.  Its hard to decipher the intentions of his patents. But once you get one of them, you learn how to read into others the same and you get more out of it.

;]

Mags 

[kEhYo77]

I have found interesting bit of information about parasitic oscillations of MOSFETs in PARALLEL (the condition is to have more than one!):
www.microsemi.com/micnotes/APT0402.pdf

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello KeHYo.  I also saw that link.  Very interesting.  And note that the only recommendation is to get rid of it.  LOL.  What fixates my attention is that zero crossing.  I wonder if we shouldn't try and digest the implications here.  It's very telling.

And Mags, very interesting.  I think once one gets into aether energy - then one just becomes obsessed.  It's the nature of the beast.  It just calls for so much attention.  Hopefully we've got aether energy here or dark energy or whatever anyone wants to call it.  We need all that abundance.

Good stuff guys.  I'm off for the day.  Nice mornings postings.

Rosemary