Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[WilbyInebriated]

I do think the reply now that eighty (80) people have downloaded that image has a real epic effect on the open source community in which Stephan was attacked and needs to be noted here on a reasonable six (6) part request he made.

Fuzzy

80 people have not 'downloaded' your picture... the count increases every time someone views that page. go look at your post and hit refresh on your browser a couple of times... look, it's over a hundred now!!! in less than 5 minutes.  yeah, real epic effect isn't it?

[hoptoad]

.

ditto your dot: LOL

cheers

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Definitely a FRIDAY 13TH that I'll remember.

I posted across our 'water to boil' test results onto my blog.  A series of 4 posts in all.  All 4 were removed.  They were my tests.  The evidence COPIOUS except that I'm still waiting to upload the video shots.  I CANNOT UNDERSTAND THIS.  Nor can I understand why they've removed my access to any further posting.  Strange things afoot.  One could almost think that they don't want this information out there  

And then the question is 'who are THEY?'  LOL.  I took the trouble to mention that this was NOT a discovery but more of an 'unfolding' of hidden potentials.  Golly.  I hope no-one's thinking of either patenting this or even suppressing it.  Those energy barriers are dead in the water.  And it's WAY too late to try and put a lid on all this.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Added.  All's good.  Apparently there are problems on Google's blog site.  I have NOT been banned - and I believe that there's an outside chance they may yet recover those posts of mine.  A couple of days of lost posts.  Golly.  That's probably numbering in the millions.  Not the best Friday 13th for them either. 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys - for those who are doing replications as a simulation - here's the required layout.  Hope it helps.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

1  Negative terminal >
2 ground of the battery scope probe >
3 wire >
4 ground of the CSR scope probe >
5 CSR >
6 CSR scope probe >
7 wire >
8 ground of the functions generator to gate of Q2 >
9 Q2 - 3 legs source drain gate >
10 wire >
11 To Q1 - 3 legs gate drain source  (respectively) >
12 input from functions generator at Q1 >
13 wire >
14 resistor element  >
15 wire >
16 scope probe on the positive terminal of the battery. >
17 batteries

I'm going to try and download a schematic but note that there's a minor amendment at 8 - 13 that needs to be applied.

[fuzzytomcat]

The attached circuit diagram was established to be Protoboard_schema_added.png for the COP> INFINITY device.

Now using the N Mosfets standard (G) Gate (S) Source and (D) Drain nomenclature and pin positions there is a discrepancy from the Simulation Schematic.

Please notice that the Mosfet (G) Gate and (S) Source connections on Q2 through Q5 are different on the Simulation Schematic.jpg posted here now http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/04/109-simulated-circuit.html#links on your blog and posted here http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg286194#msg286194



Which circuit diagram was not used and is false and inaccurate ??

Which circuit diagram was used for Rosemary's FINDING and claim of COP> INFINITY ??



Fuzzy