Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[poynt99]

The complete final analysis wrapped up in a single pdf. This includes most of the relevant posts and all schematics and scope shots.

Also included at the end are explanatory excerpts from a brief private discussion with an OU member.

Regards,
.99

[WilbyInebriated]

Heat pump analogy is absurd. No moving parts with rosemary's device, purely electrical/ heat. she should simply loop it.

it most certainly is NOT absurd...  and your 'no moving parts' argument is wholly irrelevant...
simply use the oh so well worn "black box" scenario that is pimped so often by your type...
ie: the heatpump is in a "black box".. measure input and output.
rosemary's apparatus is in a "black box".. measure input and output. 

now, if you can loop rosemary's device as you claim because it's COP is > than 1 (or whatever arbitrary number you deem viable) then a heatpump should be able to be looped as well.



from poynt's pdf.

In terms of convincing a physics professor or EE, indeed the math speaks for itself, and if they believe in math, they will see it clearly.

"Take the division 64/16. Now, canceling a 6 on top and a six on the bottom, we get that 64/16 = 4/1 = 4."
"Wait a second! You can't just cancel the six!"
"Oh, so you're telling us 64/16 is not equal to 4, are you?"

math is not infallible... nor is it immune to misuse.

[MrMag]

And it has to be constantly monitored. There could be a fire, etc.  Its not a flashlight were talking about here. ;]

Most probably think you can just check in every week for 6 months, no trouble at all.  sheesh.  ;]

Hows it going Rose?  Just keep on keepin on.  ;]

Mags

The only reason she won't do it is that I really think she knows that the batteries will drain down. It does not need to be constantly monitored, by a person anyways. It can be done very cheaply. Stick it outside in a broken down fridge. Place an IP camera inside to monitor it. Can probably be done for under $200.00. sheesh.

I was looking for Rose's blog and came across this one. Not sure if you've seen it or not Rose http://rosemaryainslie-publicblog.blogspot.com/ . Can you please post your blog address.

[poynt99]

Rose's blog:

http://www.newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

[Rosemary Ainslie]

The only reason she won't do it is that I really think she knows that the batteries will drain down. It does not need to be constantly monitored, by a person anyways. It can be done very cheaply. Stick it outside in a broken down fridge. Place an IP camera inside to monitor it. Can probably be done for under $200.00. sheesh.

I was looking for Rose's blog and came across this one. Not sure if you've seen it or not Rose http://rosemaryainslie-publicblog.blogspot.com/ . Can you please post your blog address.

Hello again MrMag.  Another BRILLIANT suggestion.  That way when everything goes up in smoke then I can buy another IP camera and all the parts required to assemble another test apparatus.  And then I can replace the scope probes - and probably the scope itself - for a mere R100 000.00 or thereby - which, in dollars, is roughly $14 000.00.  No problem at all.  I have NO IDEA why such a logical solution didn't occur to me.  Golly.  And if I do this then I'll advance the very real benefit of satisfying your idle curiosity.  I say idle because you either do not have the skills or the interest to test this all for yourself. 

That blog that you took the trouble to advertise is the one that I mentioned in my earlier gripe.  It was the comment that you dismissed ENTIRELY because your own search skills left you unable to find the evidence on OUR.com.  Let me repost it lest you missed this as well. 

Are you serious?  Do you really propose that it's me trying to discredit Poynt.99? That's got to be a joke.  Here's a man who has actively encouraged and advanced whole THREADS on his forum to his members to let rip on my reputation.  NO HOLDS BARRED.  On record is a solemn undertaking not to moderate anything at all.  To this day they hold record of post after post after post where I am accused of FRAUD - LUNACY - DUPLICITY - DELUSIONAL CONFUSIONS - IDIOCY.  Actually that last was qualified. Apparently it's presumptuous to even consider myself an IDIOT.  I'm in fact - MORONIC.  He has gone on record to say that he will DEBUNK our claim and has advised all and sundry that I have ABSOLUTELY NO KNOWLEDGE OF ANYTHING SCIENTIFIC.  He has written spiteful emails to me to tell me that it's laughably absurd for me to comment on anything at all - least of all matters scientific.  He has INVITED people to join his forums for the sole purpose of - let me emphasise this - with NO OTHER AGENDA THAN TO DISCREDIT ME IN ANY WAY THEY SEE FIT.  And while all this was going on he BLOCKED MY VIEW OF THESE COMMENTS through the simple expediency of accessing my IP ADDRESS.  And if you think - like he claims - that I am LYING - then I suggest you take a stroll there and look at this for yourself.  Nor does it end there.  He contributed to and actively supported a BLOGSPOT dedicated to maligning my reputation.  He has allowed publication and links to private videos that I rather recklessly trusted to certain replicators who then attempted to claim our technology as their PERSONAL DISCOVERY.   And if you want proof of all that - then it's also all there.  Loud and clear and unambiguous.  Not only that - but this is the REAL JOKE.  All those members ONLY JOINED his forum to INDULGE THAT ATTACK ON MY GOOD NAME.  Never joined before.  Never seen since.  That little pack of dogs, the Pickles, and Mookies and Fuzzies