Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Anyway - to continue about Poynt's measurements - for those who are following this argument.  He claims that IF you eliminate the inductance 'between' the batteries - then the numbers default that there's no 'gain'.  In other words the sum of the voltage across the shunt becomes greater than zero - which indicates a net discharge or loss of energy to the battery.  To do this he has to reduce the battery supply to just one battery.  We concur.  In fact, on our apparatus, we have actually NOT been able to get the circuit to oscillate at ALL with just an applied 12 volts.

So.  Thus far I have no quarrel with his findings.  Except that we can't duplicate the oscillation that he apparently manages - at 12 volts.  So.  From this point on - his circuit is no longer the same as ours.  It's not therefore, a replication.  So.  Whatever he determines - then it has no relevance to our test or our apparatus.

Regards
Rosemary 

[powercat]

Well Cat.  I think if you want to follow RomeroUK there's nothing stopping you.  I, personally, no longer have high hopes there. And if you're satisfied that we have nothing - then that's fine.  No-one is holding a gun to your head.  To me it seems that you're rather anxiously looking for a consensus opinion - on the efficacy of our system.  I'm afraid that science is NOT determined by consensus.  All one needs are the the measurements and some reasonable account of the apparatus that produces those measurements.
Regards
Rosemary

All one needs are the the measurements and some reasonable account of the apparatus that produces those measurements.

If that was the case why has no one in over two years reproduced your claim,when you make statements like that,I have to respond as you are being misleading.

Please do something different,this forum is not your personal blog.
Many members have made reasonable requests that you ignore including Stefan amongst others,
but you ignore them and carry on regurgitating your same old arguments.

If you're not going to interact with the members here to change the deadlock then there is no point in your thread, you already have a blog where no one can argue with what you're saying.

You are the one making the excess energy claims, no one here after two years can match those claims.
Please please please do something different or stop claiming OU on This OverUnity Forum

[poynt99]

In other words the sum of the voltage across the shunt becomes greater than zero - which indicates a net discharge or loss of energy to the battery.  To do this he has to reduce the battery supply to just one battery.  We concur.  In fact, on our apparatus, we have actually NOT been able to get the circuit to oscillate at ALL with just an applied 12 volts.

So.  Thus far I have no quarrel with his findings.  Except that we can't duplicate the oscillation that he apparently manages - at 12 volts.  So.  From this point on - his circuit is no longer the same as ours.  It's not therefore, a replication.  So.  Whatever he determines - then it has no relevance to our test or our apparatus.

Regards
Rosemary

My later simulation results are based on a battery measurement across one of the six batteries, but all six batteries are still in the circuit, powering the circuit. This was all painstakingly explained in the detailed analysis, which clearly you do not understand. Go read it please and kindly stop twisting the facts!

How can you say you are not confused? 

.99

[poynt99]

From the detailed analysis 06 document:

If each of the 6 twelve-volt batteries in the battery array have approximately the same state of
charge, terminal voltage, and internal resistance, it is reasonable to assume that each of the 6
batteries will receive or supply the same amount of power in the circuit. As such, it is valid to
measure and analyze the power in any one of the 6 batteries and apply a factor of 6x to obtain
the total power in the circuit.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

From the detailed analysis 06 document:

Where is this report? Was it hidden in that file that none of us can access?  Golly. I think you'll need to post the whole report here so that we can all read it.  Or are you trying to keep it hidden for some reason?  I don't think you can expect me to comment on something that I don't know about.  And don't give us a link Poynty.  This is open source.  Let's see that report.  Possibly you've already answered that question.  Maybe you've already told us how that positive voltage moves through those transistors. 

Regards,
Rosemary