Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Evolvingape - I have NEVER claimed a monopoly on the answers to our energy crisis.  I hope I've only ever pointed at where that answer lies.  The ways to access this are manifold.  And I think the door is barely opened a fraction.  But spare me the work of advancing anything other than what I know.  I personally think that Lasersaber's work AND Pirate's work are both FAR MORE IMPORTANT than what we're uncovering.  But that's because of what it shows.  They both need to get it to higher wattage values to make it more practical.  Meanwhile I also KNOW that we have a ready made solution to applying heat.  And I also know that anyone at all who actually takes the trouble to replicate - whether successful or not - at whatever build they try - is doing UNTOLD GOOD to this general drive towards OU. All efforts add weight to the cause that eventually those credibility barriers will just collapse.

So.  If there is another ready made solution.  That's a really good thing.  I'm not a chemist.  And, as mentioned, my interests are only in the thesis.  But I can only prove my thesis on this experiment.  But it also has the very real benefit of answering our needs for clean green.

Regards
Rosemary

[powercat]

Oh yes we have.  We've replicated our own tests PUBLICLY.  We've also got two team members who have independently replicated this as well as variations of that circuit.  AND we've got a HOST of simulations.  And WHO EXACTLY are you referring to when you say 'Why is it then that ALL the people of this forum that have ever tried your circuit have failed to match your results.'? I'm not sure that there were any.  Ever.  Certainly none that have posted here.  What I DO know is that Neptune and a couple of others were going to try.  But they moved over to try and replicate RomeroUK's work.  With good reason. Remember?  It was YOU who actively advised all to stop posting here and GO THERE.  Do try and think back CAT!  It wasn't THAT long ago.  Golly.         
When I get reasonable requests then I will certainly do whatever it is that is asked of me.  Right now I've been ASKED nothing.  I've had you and MaMags DEMAND that I do an entirely absurd test that will cost me in the region of R10 000.00 IF I do what you require.  And that DEMAND was laced with a clumsy, rude and heavy handed challenge that we could ever get our supply batteries to outperform a control.  Since we've ALREADY shown that it outperformed - then that challenge is void and meaningless.  And I'm not inclined to DO YOUR BIDDING unfortunately CAT because I'm not inclined to co-operate under that menace of denial.  Deny to your heart's content.  It means nothing.  Alternatively, do your own tests.  There's nothing to stop you.  I'm constantly AMAZED that you armchair enthusiasts can charge through these forums advocating one thing - denying another - always off the point - never with any ACTUAL knowledge, skill or authority - and DOING NOTHING YOURSELVES.  It's extraordinary.  And not only that but you then DEMAND that we do your BIDDING?  What are we?  Your slaves?  Do you think that your personal endorsements means that much that you can dispense with politeness and just sit back and call for whatever shots you require.  Do you really think that I care for your opinion?  I don't.  I assure you.  There was a time when I would have cared - deeply.  As it is I now know you SO MUCH better.
WHO HAS FALLEN ON THEIR FACE?  NOT YOU.  You've replicated NOTHING.  NOT ANY MEMBERS ON THIS FORUM?  WHO?
It is NO MORE LUDICROUS THAN TO DEMAND THAT I DO A TEST THAT WILL END UP COSTING ME R10 000.00.  Is it right that I pick up that tab?  When I KNOW that no-one will pay the slightest heed to any result that we show? 
Now we're getting closer to the truth.  What your ACTUAL beef is that there are no replications.   Therefore I must provide more evidence?  Exactly HOW do you expect me to co-operate with that concern?  Just go over your posts and tell me WHERE have you asked anything at all?  I've looked.  I see NOTHING.  What I see is an immature tantrum from a lazy armchair enthusiast insulting me in every way he can - in the absurd hopes of thereby encouraging me to co-operate and show YET MORE EVIDENCE.  All I can say is that I will NOT co-operate under any kind of coercion or duress.  I will not be bullied.  And I will not try and redeem your opinion EVER.  You may think what you like.
AGAIN.  WHAT REASONABLE REQUESTS ARE YOU REFERRING TO? 
As I say.  Your opinion related to FuzzyTomCat's work - RomeroUK's work - or anyone's work - is a matter of supreme indifference to me.  I happen to know that you're an insulting bully and that you're incapable of the intellectual rigor required to assess the truth in anything at all.
AGAIN.  No member has even TRIED to replicate our circuit.  When they do and then IF THEY FAIL - then this comment may then have some kind of historical merit. 

R

As you keep regurgitating the same old arguments, I will do the same as clearly you do not want to change the deadlock and you insist on treating this forum as your personal blog.

No doubt if you answer this you will pick on small detail and not address the main point, and you will also repeat what you said before ( this is not your blog) please interact with the reasonable requests made by members here for you to do new tests.

I personally think you should stay on this forum posting but you should do something new, and changed the deadlock that after two years nobody can reproduce your results (on this forum)

Here are few videos for members on the forum, they are other members that didn't make videos who also failed in their attempts to match your claim of OU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrwgEb5ac_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM8BBa7_Zpc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x0wQJrc9To
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GBS3sKcB8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trip8gjoxMQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpaP__5Kd38
Mr Mag has made you a very good suggestion that might go a long way to help you. That's right help you. Most people on here like to help you, but you are so stubborn and insist on repeating your claims and argue about measurements over and over again. (please do something new to prove your case)

Quote from: MrMag on June 20, 2011, 08:19:39 AM
I really don't know why you are bringing this up again. You said you weren't going to do it anyways. My point was that it could be done very easily and at a much lower cost then you mentioned. I was just pointing out a way that it could be done without anyone standing there watching it 24/7. You can say what you like, it doesn't bother me. You just have to agree that it could be done without someone sitting in front of it. And, you don't need a scope or anything hooked up to it. Just hook it up and let it run. If you will do the test, we could take a serious look at ways to enclose the device safely and try to minimize damage if a fire occurs.

Why are you so defensive and what's with all the name calling. You've called me more things in the last 4 days then I've been called in all the time I've been here. Please don't look at me as a threat, I only asked you to do a simple test and I still don't know if you understand what I am asking. TK seemed to explain it maybe a little better then I did, but I don't think I deserve all the things you've been saying. Please be a little more lady like.
End Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RomeroUK's work, You keep bringing this up, this is a classic diversionary action, RomeroUK's work and who is following it has nothing to do with this thread but you would say anything to divert the argument

The fact still remains that no one here can reproduce your claims, and you are not willing to do anything to change that deadlock, apart from use this forum as your soapbox and blog

[Rosemary Ainslie]

The fact still remains that no one here can reproduce your claims, and you are not willing to do anything to change that deadlock, apart from use this forum as your soapbox and blog

What a lie.  I've done with answering you CAT.  Do your damnedest.
R

[powercat]

The fact still remains that no one here can reproduce your claims, and you are not willing to do anything to change that deadlock, apart from use this forum as your soapbox and blog

What a lie.  I've done with answering you CAT.  Do your damnedest.
R

If anyone is lying it must be you, you can't tell me of any member on this forum that has produced OU with your circuit, because nobody has, and before you say Fuzzy did it, here is his post again

The fact still remains that no one here can reproduce your claims of OU, and you are not willing to do anything to change that deadlock, part from use this forum as your soapbox and blog.

Quote from: fuzzytomcat on May 19, 2011, 07:11:18 PM
Rosemary any credibility you had left is "GONE" especially after your posting of the pure nonsense "REPORT".

NO ONE HERE AT OVER UNITY cares about your pathetic thesis .... This thread is called Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011 for a reason none of which you have ever understood titles of threads at http://www.energeticforum.com/ .... http://www.overunityresearch.com/ ..... http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/ ..... http://www.thenakedscientists.com/ ( aka witsend , aetherevarising ) where you were banned for continued false and inaccurate statements and attacking members.   

I invite and challenge everyone readers and guests to look at the 8,000 postings of Rosemary's spread out over several years at these forums and see for yourself.

This thread here at OU.com was to show evidence of a finding on a claim of "YOURS" on efficiency of a experimental device "YOU" claim to have a COP> INFINITY.

You have not shown in any "SCIENTIFIC METHOD" how to obtain this efficiency in any way shape or form a experimental device "YOU" claim to have a COP> INFINITY and have "FAILED" miserably only a grade or high school electronic class will be interested in your claim.

You ( Rosemary ) cannot supply one credible package of one experiment that includes a circuit diagram with oscilloscope screen shots done during the test not even one to verify your claim of a finding.

The REPORT failed .... nothing for a independent experimentalist to take and to make a device to your specifications for testing and evaluation in a scientific method to verify the claim on a finding of COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY .... COP> INFINITY ....

There is nothing in this thread of value you are a terrible inventor and experimentalist and my credentials and expertise stand on there own and well documented unlike yours ..... this is what documentation looks like .... FYI
http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits.html  ( nine pages !!!! )
http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater

I won't be so nice to ask you a "TENTH" time here in this thread to do the testing in a scientific method required and do it correctly, not half ass or less as you have shown or are you incapable of the request.

Facts only Facts can you do that ? Are you capable Rosemary ? Do you need someone to hold your hand ?   

Fuzzy

Reply

[MrMag]

edit: my bad, it wasn't a lemon, it was a potato...
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8387.msg215247#msg215247

Ahh, another one of those pickled herring statements. You should try to get your facts straight if you are going to try to use them against someone. But you never post the part where I admit I was wrong. Why is that?