Seeking funding for potential over unity device.

[questioneverything]

I've posted here before about my generator design, and even posted a link to my blog about converting a dead alternator into a high torque, high RPM, 3 phase motor.

I've tried getting people not affiliated with big oil or government out here to test my systems, but it was nothing but a run around. Their more closed minded than the skeptics, and condemn EVERYTHING without so much as looking. Namely Mark Dansie and his people.

NOW I'm seeking audience from oil companies, the military, the government, and anyone else wanting the systems for PROFIT. I know most of them don't post here and just watch, so here's my personal email address.

AND I DON'T WANT UNEDUCATED DUMMIES GIVING ME WARNINGS ABOUT HOW DANGEROUS POSTING MY EMAIL IS! KEEP YOUR NOSE ON YOUR OWN FACE!

babygirl8181980@gmail.com

[Feynman]

C'mon man...  Defense contractors like L******* and R******* et all have had these systems for 20+ years, probably more like 50 years.  At this point , I'm sure their technology is highly evolved nth generation full life cycle units, in full production for black budget.

No personal offense here, but Why would they care about converting a dead alternator to a high torque high RPM 3phase motor?    You are better off open-sourcing it if it's legit;  no one makes money off free energy.

As bolt says, and I agree, the days of the 80s and 90s are over.  No investor funds this stuff.  You want to create it, you have to fund it off your own spare change or with assistance of family and friends.  That's just the sad reality of the world we live in.

[Omnibus]

C'mon man...  Defense contractors like L******* and R******* et all have had these systems for 20+ years, probably more like 50 years.  At this point , I'm sure their technology is highly evolved nth generation full life cycle units, in full production for black budget.

No personal offense here, but Why would they care about converting a dead alternator to a high torque high RPM 3phase motor?    You are better off open-sourcing it if it's legit;  no one makes money off free energy.

As bolt says, and I agree, the days of the 80s and 90s are over.  No investor funds this stuff.  You want to create it, you have to fund it off your own spare change or with assistance of family and friends.  That's just the sad reality of the world we live in.

Can't agree more. The goal get our studies in the mainstream of science so that funding which now goes for sheer crap to be funneled into avenues such as OU which will benefit humanity. This is an idealistic (no profit involved), purely scientific pursuit which should be conducted as openly as possible.

[MrMag]

Can't agree more. The goal get our studies in the mainstream of science so that funding which now goes for sheer crap to be funneled into avenues such as OU which will benefit humanity. This is an idealistic (no profit involved), purely scientific pursuit which should be conducted as openly as possible.

Get it into mainstream science. That shouldn't take long. If you go the scientific route you can forget it. Nothing will ever happen. You really need to get family and friends to loan you some money so that you can build one. If it is OU and it can be replicated, why would you care what the scientist have to say. I would care less.

[Omnibus]

Isn't there a moderator to curb the troll @MrMag. Incompetent people such as @MrMag should not set the tone of this forum and should not be allowed to destroy the discussions.