The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

[MotorMagik]

Hi All,

Found this description on the Nanoperm:
Abstract:
Controlled crystallization of amorphous NANOPERM-type Fe76Mo8Cu1B15 alloy leads to the formation of crystalline grains of about 10 nm in size. The evolution of crystallization and its impact on the resulting magnetic properties is followed by nuclear and atomic based techniques of (subatomic) structural characterization comprising Mössbauer spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, high resolution transmission electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and atomic force microscopy. The amount of nanocrystalline grains identified as bcc-Fe rises with temperature of annealing and influences magnetic states of the original amorphous precursor. Results of structural characterization are correlated with magnetic data obtained from macroscopic measurements. In the samples with low contents of nanocrystallites, a deterioration of soft magnetic properties is observed. A very good soft magnetic behaviour is regained, however, towards the end of the primary crystallization process. (© 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

I think the exotic nature of this material may be key. I looked at some Magnetics products and found Magnesil (K) which has 97% Fe while the others had high Ni content. They don't seem to have a comparable mix.

MotorMagik

[AmericanMan31]

Good info, MotorMagik-- So I feel that 97% Fe would create better field potential however, may also lead to some of the saturation problems. Maybe a High Ni content would be better though--I dunno... What are your thoughts on the matter?

[MotorMagik]

Hi AmericanMan31,
Nickel has about 1/10 the permeability of Iron so this will change the saturation curves (lower saturation flux density). IMO the Nanoperm's secret lies in the 10nm magnetic domains. Perhaps the closer we get to the quantum level with these domains the better the energy transfer effect. Just guessing out loud at this point.

[AmericanMan31]

..."Magnetic permeability,  relative increase or decrease in the resultant magnetic field inside a material compared with the magnetizing field in which the given material is located; or the property of a material that is equal to the magnetic flux density B established within the material by a magnetizing field divided by the magnetic field strength H of the magnetizing field. Magnetic permeability μ (Greek mu) is thus defined as μ = B/H. Magnetic flux density B is a measure of the actual magnetic field within a material considered as a concentration of magnetic field lines, or flux, per unit cross-sectional area. Magnetic field strength H is a measure of the magnetizing field produced by electric current flow in a coil of wire.

In empty, or free, space the magnetic flux density is the same as the magnetizing field because there is no matter to modify the field. In centimetreâ€"gramâ€"second (cgs) units, the permeability B/H of space is dimensionless and has a value of 1. In metreâ€"kilogramâ€"second (mks) and SI units, B and H have different dimensions, and the permeability of free space (symbolized μ0) is defined as equal to 4Ï€ × 10-7 weber per ampere-metre so that the mks unit of electric current may be the same as the practical unit, the ampere. In these systems the permeability, B/H, is called the absolute permeability μ of the medium. The relative permeability μr is then defined as the ratio μ/μ0, which is dimensionless and has the same numerical value as the permeability in the cgs system. ........Thus, the relative permeability of free space, or vacuum, is 1.

Materials may be classified magnetically on the basis of their permeabilities. A diamagnetic material has a constant relative permeability slightly less than 1. ....When a diamagnetic material, such as bismuth, is placed in a magnetic field, the external field is partly expelled, and the magnetic flux density within it is slightly reduced. ......A paramagnetic material has a constant relative permeability slightly more than 1. When a paramagnetic material, such as platinum, is placed in a magnetic field, it becomes slightly magnetized in the direction of the external field. A ferromagnetic material, such as iron, does not have a constant relative permeability. As the magnetizing field increases, the relative permeability increases, reaches a maximum, and then decreases. Purified iron and many magnetic alloys have maximum relative permeabilities of 100,000 or more."
BTW--Bismuth has a relative Permability LESS THAN ONE (<1)!

I Sense that having such a Diamagnetic structure as part of shell of the torus would impart a NEGATIVE field Gradient that would essentially.."Ring" the oscillatory frequency of whatever makes the device work, "spatial field coherance" or a zero-tap on the surrounding field effect coming into the inside of the shell. ..Any feedback anyone?

[wayne49s]

Here's pictures of the complete core before I start testing:

http://img830.imageshack.us/img830/6494/img0139ji.jpg

The outer core is about 10" diameter.

/Wayne