Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

Started by Feynman, March 22, 2011, 04:07:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 29 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mavendex

@Mags

its more of a trade off from what I gather on the secondary turns, its like watt tradeing, x amount of volts will transfer in to x amount of amps up to when you run out of voltage to trade. By stepping up your voltage it seems you can pull some good amps but the smaller the wire you go well then the less amps you can handle.

With 3.5 ohms of 14 gauge wire I was able to create 7 amps at 110 volts on the secondary which made the transformer about 78%, but if you just draw 2.5 amps and increase power the voltage will fly high and you will go over cause your not causing anymore bmf with the increased amperage out. Its strictly magnetisim, so to counter BEMF cause the nanoperm can only hold so much we lower our current and stack on volts. and volts play a small part in the magnetic environment.

same length of secondary with 16 guage about 5.2ohms, Slightly different voltage to amperage trade off is there but now you have a ton more voltage to play with, still can't seem to hit that magic mark of 1000 volts.

So now Im trying that with 21 gauge about 17.8 ohms it should handle 2 amps or so and dropping on the same length of wire, if the case is true then we can scale down the model and possibly get some high temp wire and go for like 10k volts and a couple of amps.

Nice to hear about the ac in a box that is exciting :)

Mavendex

Quote from: SchubertReijiMaigo on August 26, 2011, 02:17:49 PM
@ All: just finished to wind my 35 turns...
Made some test at 12 VAC 50 Hz, in short the result was exactly the same of the precedent EXP...

Some remind of the protocol (Vers 1.3)
1) Same turns number primary and secondary.
2) Same bulbs and same filament...
3) Same input generator (test with amplifier will be tomorrow, because now I'm tired and the end of the day...)
4) Winding is BOTH CW, BUT winding direction is different (the inner core is toward the INTERIOR and the outer core is toward the EXTERIOR...)


So like Mav said above a version with high voltage will be preferred, if not then phase difference phenomena and increase thickness shell, I wait for my 2kg 16 AWG magnet wire...

@ Mav: 1600 feet by hand: a new record  8)
You should be have a high voltage here, but did you notice the poor voltage regulation at the secondary if you place a heavy load voltage start to droop, if you place more heavy load or short circuit the primary start to draw some current also !!!

@ Mag:
Common mistake about trafo: no, less turns into primary will saturate the inner also, because of the nature of AC input which is totally different from DC magnetisation, more turns = more inductance = more impedance = lesser current = lesser magnetisation of the core...

And saturation of the inner core give me bad result with my current version (more current flowing in the primary bulb than the  secondary one then wasted energy)

I thought you were counterwinding the coils, one clockwise and one ccw. good test!

Also yes I did notice how the trade got worse as the more amps you pulled, but when you get your meter you will see that the heavier the load on the secondary your powerfactor will drop also or make it more reactive it least thats the way it works with what ive been useing. If you add turns to the primary it will also lower the powerfactor or make it more reactive.

broli

This might be an experiment that doesn't tell that much but I'm curious to know what the inductance difference would be between just measuring the inductance on the outer coil and measuring the same coil while you saturate the inner coil with DC current.

SchubertReijiMaigo

@ Mav:
QuoteI thought you were counterwinding the coils, one clockwise and one ccw. good test tho

No, sorry, I' will test it also CW inner CCW outer, but both exterior toward interior (since it doesn't make effect...)

SRM.

Hope

Who needs a nano perm core? I DO! The NJ Magnetec office will make good deals on orders over single pieces, so perhaps we can order thru some trusted mate here at OU.  They should be willing to collect the monies first along with our request (s)  and make a group order.  Shipping should be (make sure of this)  ground and make sure of handling rates BEFORE you place the order(s).??  Any volunteers? The M417 is nearly one hundred dollars off when ordering in multiple quantities.  So it is in our best interests to order in volume.  BTY these cores Currie temp is 600C but operating recommended at 137C. 

http://www.powerwerx.com/wire-cable/magnet-wire.html?gclid=CNPP7rf56qoCFYcZQgod0ANJNw 
this wire outlet is selling superior grades of magnet wire.